Best iPod model to buy solely for audio use | iLounge Article


Best iPod model to buy solely for audio use

Ask iLounge offers readers the opportunity to get answers to their iPod-, iPhone-, iPad-, iTunes-, or Apple TV-related questions from a member of the iLounge editorial team. We'll answer several questions here each week, and of course, you can always get help with more immediate concerns from the iLounge Discussion Forums. Submit your questions for consideration using our Ask iLounge Submit Form. We reserve the right to edit questions for grammar, spelling, and length.

View the complete Ask iLounge archives...

Q: I’m contemplating switching my extensive classical music collection to an iPod, which I do not now own. What is the best model to buy just for audio use? No video, no camera or other uses.

- Peter

A: You note that you have an “extensive” collection and storage capacity is therefore likely to be an important factor. Typically the iPod classic is still the device of choice among users primarily interested in storing and listening to large audio collections.

This would especially be the case if you’re concerned about sound quality, as you will likely want to use higher bit-rates to encode your music, thereby producing larger files. To put this in perspective, an AAC or MP3 file encoded at 128kbps—generally considered to be the minimum acceptable quality—will use approximately 1MB of storage for every 1 minute of audio; a 256kbps file, which is the format now sold on the iTunes Store, will take up twice the storage, or about 2MB for every 1 minute of audio. Move up to lossless formats and the storage requirements increase even further—as much as five to ten times more depending on the format and source material.

A 160GB iPod classic has a formatted capacity of just under 149GB, or approximately 149,000 MB. When used to store only 256kbps AAC files, the device could contain around 1,200 hours of music.

That said, the iPod classic is not without its downside, even for audio only use. The most significant limitation is that you’re confined to the storage capacity of its internal hard drive; if your library is larger than this, you will need to pick and choose what content you want to carry around with you and what gets left behind. iTunes features such as Smart Playlists can help you automatically rotate your music collection based on criteria such as rating, how many times you’ve played a track and how recently you’ve played it, but if your collection is larger than the capacity of your iPod you’ll still need to physically plug the device into your computer every so often to refresh your content with different music.

Despite being lower in capacity, this is one area where Apple’s iOS devices may actually be of benefit. While the largest iPod touch still caps out at 64GB, the addition of Wi-Fi and iTunes Match provides the ability to effectively store your entire library on Apple’s iCloud servers and access any track from anywhere that a Wi-Fi Internet connection is available. Further, you can still download tracks manually for offline listening on your device and in fact a copy is automatically downloaded for any track you listen to on your device.

The Internet connectivity of the iPod touch (and other iOS devices) provides other audio-related benefits beyond your own collection as well. A multitude of free streaming music apps are available for listening to everything from actual radio stations (broadcasting over the Internet) to subscription-based online music services that provide a catalog of millions of on-demand tracks for a monthly fee. By contract, the iPod classic is limited to playing only the content that you specifically load onto it, from your computer, via iTunes.







« Cannot sync ‘Now Playing’ queue between iPod and iTunes

Avoiding automatic sync on iOS devices »

Related Stories



This question interests me as well. However, sound quality and portability are my key factors. Therefore, I’m willing to sacrifice quantity dictated by device capacity as well as time needed to continually manage a collection.

I use high-end, audiophile quality headphones and earbuds without an amp as mobility is critical. Much as some people have better than 20/20 vision, as a rule, I can hear the difference between lossless and uncompressed files, particularly with air and decay, soundstage and placement. In any case, most of my library is uncompressed.

This makes listening with intent a joyous experience. The price, of course, is the maintenance required to keep my portable library fresh and current with taste.

Given these considerations, please comment as to whether the classic or Touch models are identical in sound reproduction. By my ears, the Touch is superior though, like many, I yearn for a quality equalizer.

Also, please speculate as to what you envision as improvements we can look forward to in future device generations.

Thank you.

Posted by aztlanblues in Toronto on June 4, 2012 at 2:15 PM (CDT)


I would like to know too.
I guess iPod classic can store more uncompressed files. So it’s good.
I went to apple store, and they said the hardware is same, but the software is what makes the difference, because when software is updated, it sounds better. I have an iPod touch 3rd gen 64 gb. As I thought it was the same. And it’s cheap. Hmmm…the power out put of the device is different to I think. iPod nano compared to touch and classic. And compared to new ipad. I found using my sensier hd555 on iPod touch is loud enough on two bars lower than max volume.

Posted by Thomas in Toronto on October 15, 2012 at 5:05 AM (CDT)

iLounge Weekly

Recent News

Recent Reviews

Recent Articles

Sign up for the iLounge Weekly Newsletter

iLounge is an independent resource for all things iPod, iPhone, iPad, and beyond.
iPod, iPhone, iPad, iTunes, Apple TV, Mac, and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc.
iLounge is © 2001 - 2018 iLounge, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy