Editorial: 10 Remaining Questions About Apple’s Next iPad | iLounge Article


Editorial: 10 Remaining Questions About Apple’s Next iPad

We knew back in January what it would look like—virtually identical to the iPad 2—yet the key guts of Apple’s next-generation iPad remain at least somewhat mysterious a week before its debut. Certain assumptions can be made with some certainty right now, but there are also a number of questions that remain unanswered. These are some of the things our editors have been discussing in the lead up to the new iPad’s release, and what we will be focusing on in the immediate future.

(1) The Retina Display. It’s a given at this point that Apple has quadrupled the iPad 2’s resolution for the new iPad—four pixels wherever there used to be one—and the results should be remarkable: it would be downright shocking if an iPad Retina Display wasn’t every bit as detailed and colorful as the ones on the iPhone and iPod touch. Whereas a 9.7” 2048x1536 screen was a thing of fantasy only two years ago, it’s now a reality, and should be capable of displaying even full 1080p videos without dropping pixels.

On the other hand, the screen Apple’s using is brand new, so no one’s quite sure yet about factors such as its color gamut, brightness, and viewing angles. It would be great if the new iPad improved upon its predecessor in these regards, but there are no guarantees due to the novelty of the display, and Apple may have had to compromise a little when sourcing the part. If it has, the new iPad’s suitability for certain applications—photo editing, to name just one—might suffer. It’s also unclear whether Apple will change the coatings on the front glass to reduce fingerprint oils and reflectivity, or improve the screen’s visibility outdoors, all issues that remained from iPad to iPad 2.

(2) The Chips. The performance leap between the first two iPads was non-trivial—the iPad 2’s dual-core A5 CPU and 7-9X more powerful graphics processor took iOS gaming to new heights, enabling developers to improve the polygon counts, textures, and shading of 3-D objects. And the extra speed also made AirPlay Screen Mirroring possible with the Apple TV. It was such a big jump, seemingly out of nowhere, that the one-year-old iPad soon looked underpowered.

No conclusive evidence has yet established whether Apple will use a modestly modified A5 or a considerably upgraded A6 chip in the next iPad, but unlike last year’s model, a big jump in performance will be necessary just to power the new display—and even after that jump, users might actually see frame rate dips in Retina Display-ready games. Arguably more important than whether the new iPad will be dual-core or quad-core is how comfortably Apple has equipped the new iPad with RAM; game developers have often knocked past platforms for picking the right CPU and GPU, then starving them for memory to make proper use of the hardware. We have our fingers crossed that Apple has made the same sort of smart choices here as it has with its prior iOS devices, but with a new screen, all bets are off.

(3) Pricing. Apple’s $499/$599/$699 price points for the iPad and iPad 2—along with premiums for 3G versions—have been hard for rivals to match with even nearly equivalent products, and it’s highly unlikely that the company will completely abandon a pricing matrix that’s been working so well since 2010. If anything, Apple will try to drop the entry price of the iPad family further, undercutting competitors with a more affordable iPad 2, just as it has done with the iPhone family.

That said, rumors have suggested that Apple may increase the price of the new iPad to offset its costs in sourcing improved components—and possibly higher labor costs at its contract manufacturers. While we would normally consider a higher price impossible, it would be very easy for Apple to justify by forking the family into “low-end iPad 2” and “high-end iPad 3” versions. iPads could “start at $399” and become more expensive from there; if you want the hot new technology, you have to pay a little more for it.

(4) Siri. The addition of Siri to the iPhone 4S was one of several signature features that people have hoped would trickle down to all of Apple’s other devices. But it mightn’t, at least this year. Apple conspicuously left Siri’s predecessor “Voice Control” completely out of the iPad and iPad 2, despite including it within everything from the iPhone 3GS to the iPod touch.

Siri relies on dual-microphone noise-canceling technology to properly understand voices, and as we’ve noticed through testing, begins to fall in accuracy when used over Bluetooth. Additionally, Siri requires an “always on” Internet connection, which iPhones have but iPads do not. Apple may have improved the microphone and related hardware inside the new iPad; it might also be comfortable enough with Siri’s robotic and now well-known “can’t access the Internet right now” apologies that it won’t limit the feature solely to iPhones. However, no leaks of a Siri interface for the iPad have appeared, and we’ve seen no evidence of a second microphone hole like the one on the iPhone 4/4S, which make this one pretty iffy.

(5) Camera Resolutions. It’s probably no coincidence that the camera lens hole on the new iPad’s back is the same size as the iPhone 4S’s—at a bare minimum, Apple is improving the rear camera by letting it gather more light. But there’s no guarantee that it will use the same 8-Megapixel sensor as the iPhone 4S, particularly given that Apple has previously picked disappointingly poor cameras for iPod touches and iPads. Apart from user complaints, the single biggest factor that will push Apple to improve iPad front and rear camera performance is how poor low-resolution images and videos will look on the new Retina Display; FaceTime HD (720p) on the front and 1080p video recording on the rear seem to be a lock.

(6) Capacities. Higher-resolution screens demand higher-resolution art and videos, which demand higher storage capacities. Yet Apple has not always obliged this need with higher-capacity devices right away. It took until the release of the iPhone 4S for Apple to introduce a 64GB model—18 months after it shipped the first iPhone with a Retina Display—so it’s unclear whether a 128GB iPad is coming soon. On the other side of the spectrum, Apple has shown a willingness to sell very capacity-restricted devices at low prices, and could release an 8GB iPad 2 at an entry level price. We suspect that 16GB is going to remain the capacity floor for iPads, and possibly will be restricted to the iPad 2, but we wouldn’t put money on this.

(7) Battery Power. Apple can easily shrink almost any device from generation to generation just by reducing the size of its battery, so it’s very telling that the new iPad is slightly thicker than its predecessor. Only time will tell whether the battery has gotten bigger or remains the same—crowded by other new components, such as the screen. Our suspicion is that Apple was unwilling to compromise the iPad’s 10-hour battery life for the sake of slimness, however, a lot will depend on how power-hungry the CPU and GPU are this time, as well as the cellular hardware Apple has selected for 4G/LTE support.

(8) Bluetooth 4 + NFC. While the addition of a Bluetooth 4 / Bluetooth Smart chip is a near-certainty, given that it has appeared in newer Macs and the iPhone 4S, near-field communication hardware is a big question mark. Rumors have suggested for more than a year that Apple was working on ways to let its devices be used for wireless payments at stores, but it’s remained unclear as to which devices—if any—would get the feature. The iPhone is a natural, but the iPad would be a modest stretch for NFC to make its debut. This isn’t to say it’s not going to happen.

(9) 802.11ac Wi-Fi. The next big wireless standard is 802.11ac, and as high-definition video bandwidth continues to grow, the demand for more powerful routers and devices will, too. Unlike pocket devices, which will be challenged to add the antennas and other hardware necessary to support 802.11ac, the new iPad could pull this off. That said, while it’s not impossible, we think it’s unlikely, given that 802.11ac chips are still in very early production at this point. Our best guess is that this will wait for the fourth-generation iPad next year.

(10) Full HD AirPlay Screen Mirroring. One of the bigger surprises in Apple’s developer preview of OS X Mountain Lion was that Apple conspicuously announced AirPlay Screen Mirroring with 720p resolution—a restriction that has been okay for the sub-720p iPad 2 and iPhone 4S, but might not work as well for higher-resolution Macs, say nothing of the next iPad’s 2048x1536 apps. Since there’s no HDTV on the market that can display all of those pixels, Apple’s definitely going to have to downsample the new iPad’s screen to share it on common televisions, but is it going to fall back to 720p, or try for a more powerful—and bandwidth-hungry—1080p stream? We’ll have to see, but based on the best information we’ve gathered, a 1080p-ready third-generation Apple TV should be available very soon.

Several Questions We Don’t Have: Things That Are Basically Guaranteed

(1) Home Button Changes. The Home Button was one of the first iPad 3 parts to leak out of factories. There’s a hole in the glass for a Home Button. It’s going to be there, and basically indistinguishable from its predecessors.

(2) New Dock Connector. Changes to the universal 30-pin connector for iPads, iPhones, and iPods have been rumored for years. They’re not going to start with the new iPad.

(3) Unified Wi-Fi/3G Models. We’ve been hoping that Apple would get the costs down for 3G hardware enough that it could just switch to a single iPad model with cellular service as an option. But there’s a high likelihood that the new iPad will launch with LTE support, and we’ve already seen leaked shells for separate Wi-Fi-only and cellular models. 3G/4G will continue to sell at a premium for the time being.

(4) Color Choices. There will still be white and black versions to choose from.

(5) Smart Covers. They’ll still work with the iPad 3, and match the unchanged dimensions of the front glass.

Do you have next-generation iPad questions that remain unresolved in your mind? We’d like to read them—feel free to share them in the comments section below!

« iOS Gems for Foodies: Foodspotting, Forkly + Today’s Beer

iOS Gems: Blueprint 3D HD, Munch Time HD + WrestleFest HD »

Related Stories



The new 3.14 Megapixel display will be wonderful for reading comic books.  But I can imagine the fear Marvel might have at how easy it will be to take full resolution screen snapshots of their content.  Which might keep them from releasing retina updated comics.  Do you think this is a concern Apple could have anticipated?  Do you think they’ll do something to allow apps to disable screen capture or at least down-rez it to iPad 2 levels?

On cellular enabled iPad 3’s will Apple bump up the 20MB download limit given how much bigger retina-enabled iPad 3 apps are going to be?

Any chance Apple will move the dock connector on the iPad 3 to the side so that at least a third party company can produce a reasonable snap on folding keyboard for the iPad 3 like the one for the Asus Transformer?

Any chance of stylus support, meaning a way to get accurate drawing with a thin stylus tip, something that isn’t possible with the current capacitive displays?  I know none of us want a stylus to be required to operate the thing, but there are artists and others out there who would love an option like this.  Yes I know its a long shot.

How about an IR emitter on the thing so it can be a decent multi-function remote without requiring a dock or headphone jack snapon?  Again, understand this is unlikely.

What about a smaller iPad?  Obviously you’re thinking the iPad 2 sticks around at $399 and there are no smaller iPads.  And yes I know about Steve’s rant about how 7” iPads are a bad idea.  But personally I think an 8” say iPad Mini with an iPad 2 resolution screen would be viable and popular.  No I don’t think they really need it to keep the Android tablets at bay, but honestly they have different size Airs, different size iPods, why not two iPad sizes?  Before Christmas maybe?

Do you think the Apple TV 3/1080p will be introduced at the same event, or will it just show up in the Apple store?

Any chance of the iPod Touch getting updated?  Even if all they do is a better rear camera?

How about support for Cisco’s Wifi/cellular handoff?

Will Apple release an LTE iPad?  You hinted at it but never said explicitly.  I’m not sure its a lock myself.

Posted by Fanfoot in East Amherst, NY, USA on March 2, 2012 at 1:00 AM (CST)


I am very curious to see the next generation models of iPhones and iPads. So far, iPhone 4S has the same design (more-or-less) of the iPhone 4 and the iPad 3 looks to be more or less like the iPad 2.

What I am keen on seeing is what Johnny Ive comes up with in the absense of Steve. I highly doubt that the next gen iPhone will look the same. It will be very interesting to see the design choices that Apple makes in Steve’s absence.

Posted by Sreedhar in East Amherst, NY, USA on March 2, 2012 at 1:17 AM (CST)


Great article, Jeremy. I just wanted to touch on your point about the display and resolution.

We all know that Apple goes to the greatest lengths to tout their displays and their beauty. For something like an iMac where the display, ironically enough, is secondary to specs and design of the unit, they might not necessarily go over the top. However, with the iPad, where the display is your main focus of interaction, watching movies, etc., I don’t think they would go with a display that is subpar in any of the areas of colour gamut, brightness, and saturation.

The other point you made was about needing a lot of power to run the display. That is true, but was since made a non-issue in the iPad 2 I believe. The A5 has 9x the graphics processing power than that of the A4 chip. So, given a screen that has four times the resolution (two times in each direction, of course), that means the A5 will still have approximately 3-5x the graphics processing power of the original A4 even with the new resolution. I predict we’ll be seeing an A5X chip, not an A6 at the new event, so while it will be a bump, it certainly won’t be another 9x on top of the A5. Either way, it’ll be more than enough for the new iPad to run faster than the original, even though it’s pushing four times the number of pixels.

That could also be great for battery life. I don’t think we’ll be getting more than the 10 hours we’re used to - maaaayyyyybe we’ll see 12 - but that’s because Apple went with an A5X as opposed to a brand new A6 chip I’m guessing.

Of course, this is all conjecture at this point, but it is fun to discuss.


Posted by Christopher Kalanderopoulos in East Amherst, NY, USA on March 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM (CST)


“We have our fingers crossed that Apple has made the same sort of smart choices here as it has with its prior iOS devices”

The more than a dozen app termination by the OS logs I generate each and every day from lack of sufficient RAM on my fourth gen touch counters this claim. Most games aimed specifically at the iPad platform explicitly don’t support the iPad 1 any more because the memory issue is even worse with the larger display.

So, if we’re grading Apple on getting a good enough processor with enough RAM to support the display and a moderately complex game style app, you’re looking at one out of four touch models (the 3G), three out of five for the iPhone models, and one out of two for the iPad models.

If we’re going by past choices, there’s less than 50/50 odds that Apple won’t screw it up. Just saying.

Posted by Code Monkey in East Amherst, NY, USA on March 4, 2012 at 12:40 PM (CST)


I have bought all three ipads. I don’t know what apple can do to make me rush out for the next one uless there are more producttivity apps related to my profession that require a faster processor or storage.  There is an exception…my dream for the next IPad is a daylight viewable screen. I would love to be able to read my books, mags, email, or whatever sitting outdoors on a bright spring or summer day. For work it will be nice to be able to make notes, fill in forms while being outdoors.  As for design, I don’t think there is a need for any radical changes…except reducing the size of the bezel.

Posted by Irwin Wilensky in East Amherst, NY, USA on April 8, 2012 at 12:08 PM (CDT)


With the emergence of the ipad3, these problems are solved quickly.

Posted by breeda in East Amherst, NY, USA on September 11, 2012 at 3:30 AM (CDT)

iLounge Weekly

Recent News

Recent Reviews

Recent Articles

Sign up for the iLounge Weekly Newsletter

iLounge is an independent resource for all things iPod, iPhone, iPad, and beyond.
iPod, iPhone, iPad, iTunes, Apple TV, Mac, and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc.
iLounge is © 2001 - 2019 iLounge, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy