Article
Mac mini Xbench Comparative Performance Benchmarks
The XBench test results for eight Mac OS X computer configurations are shown below. Six of the configurations are Mac mini computers with different amounts of RAM. Two are high-end PowerBook G4 computers, one running under typical, unoptimized conditions, the other optimized for maximum benchmark performance. All tests except “PowerBook 1.5Ghz 1GB RAM” were run at 1024x768 resolution. The 1.5Ghz 1GB RAM test results were taken from the peak performing 1.5GHz PowerBook listed on the comparisons page at XBench.com.
Higher scores are better. A score of 100 on any test shows equivalent performance to a dual-processor G4 Macintosh that was touted by Apple as 83 percent faster on Adobe Photoshop than a 1.7GHz Pentium 4 Windows PC. In every case except disk speed, the lowest-priced Mac mini configuration was over 11% faster than that reference machine, and frequently upwards of 30% faster. More expensive Mac mini configurations show 25% to 75% performance increases. As such, even the cheapest Mac mini will likely represent a performance improvement for low-end PC users who have not upgraded over the last several years.
The results also broadly suggest that an increase of Mac mini RAM from 256MB to 512MB yields a noticeable performance increase for both CPU-intensive tasks and regular use of a Mac mini’s user interface, regardless of clock speed. Mac minis use slower hard disks than the PowerBooks and therefore had lower disk speeds.
In many cases, the Mac minis outperformed the unoptimized PowerBook 1.5Ghz machine in the benchmarks despite lower CPU clock speeds; however, an ideally optimized PowerBook can outperform all competitors by some margin. For reference, a well-oiled but not perfect PowerBook will score closer to the 150 mark overall, and will not see the dramatic performance jumps indicated in the User Interface and Disk Test sections below.
Overall Score
Overall Score reflects the cumulative results of seven major tests of system performance (and their associated sub-tests), as broken down below.
| Model | Processor | Memory | Time (seconds) | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 256MB | 114.36 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 512MB | 116.01 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 1GB | 116.12 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 256MB | 144.99 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 512MB | 144.60 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 1GB | 145.30 | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 512MB | 115.21 (unoptimized) | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 1GB | 182.43 (best measured) |
CPU Test
CPU Test consists of five tests that collectively measure one processor running one application with different sorts of math processes.
| Model | Processor | Memory | Time (seconds) | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 256MB | 137.60 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 512MB | 151.97 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 1GB | 152.59 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 256MB | 161.67 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 512MB | 172.25 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 1GB | 169.04 | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 512MB | 116.82 (unoptimized) | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 1GB | 180.97 (best measured) |
Thread Test
Thread Test uses two tests to simulate multiple applications or a single application running multiple processes at once. Shows dramatic benefits on a machine with multiple processors, which none of the test machines here have.
| Model | Processor | Memory | Time (seconds) | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 256MB | 111.06 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 512MB | 112.16 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 1GB | 126.95 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 256MB | 124.95 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 512MB | 124.22 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 1GB | 122.97 | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 512MB | 114.31 (unoptimized) | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 1GB | 131.82 (best measured) |
Memory Test
Memory Test includes seven tests to show computer’s ability to perform memory operations, measuring memory bandwidth.
| Model | Processor | Memory | Time (seconds) | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 256MB | 131.25 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 512MB | 131.46 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 1GB | 132.89 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 256MB | 132.20 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 512MB | 130.01 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 1GB | 135.63 | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 512MB | 123.42 (unoptimized) | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 1GB | 137.65 (best measured) |
Quartz Graphics Test
Five tests of the Quartz Graphics system challenge the machine’s graphics card, memory bandwidth, CPU, and floating point capabilities at once.
| Model | Processor | Memory | Time (seconds) | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 256MB | 136.73 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 512MB | 160.83 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 1GB | 155.63 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 256MB | 173.55 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 512MB | 179.39 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 1GB | 175.79 | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 512MB | 137.54 (unoptimized) | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 1GB | 278.85 (best measured) |
OpenGL Graphics Test
A single test uses the graphics card and CPU together to determine 3D performance.
| Model | Processor | Memory | Time (seconds) | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 256MB | 111.56 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 512MB | 111.26 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 1GB | 113.35 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 256MB | 121.92 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 512MB | 123.11 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 1GB | 120.11 | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 512MB | 106.86 (unoptimized) | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 1GB | 117.09 (best measured) |
User Interface Test
The single UI Test shows a system’s performance in drawing "standard system controls." Again, the graphics card and CPU are tested.
| Model | Processor | Memory | Time (seconds) | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 256MB | 213.02 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 512MB | 217.16 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 1GB | 217.56 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 256MB | 219.97 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 512MB | 227.79 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 1GB | 222.73 | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 512MB | 181.60 (unoptimized) | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 1GB | 300.64 (best measured) |
Disk Test
Four disk tests together show typical throughput to the hard disk and seek time of the drive. A less fragmented, empty drive does better than a full and/or fragmented one.
| Model | Processor | Memory | Time (seconds) | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 256MB | 56.97 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 512MB | 57.38 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.25Ghz | 1GB | 57.25 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 256MB | 63.01 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 512MB | 60.89 | |||
| Mac mini | 1.42Ghz | 1GB | 62.83 | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 512MB | 75.72 (unoptimized) | |||
| PowerBook | 1.5Ghz | 1GB | 393.55 (best measured) |
Related Stories
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iOS 5.1
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of Apple TV 5.0
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iTunes 10.6
- Instant Expert: iTunes U for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iBooks 2.0
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: Honorable Mentions
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Panic releases Diet Coda
- Booq rolls out new Folio for iPad
- Apple removes Airfoil Speakers Touch from the App Store
- Tweetbot adds Nearby tweets, Keyword mute filters + more
- Facebook releases Facebook Camera
- Third-gen iPad shipping times drop to 1-3 days
- Bump adds photo to computer transfers
- Sharp to supply tech for Foxconn iPhone display plant
- Infinity Blade II: Vault of Tears update released
- Apple claims e-book lawsuit is ‘fundamentally flawed’
Recent Reviews
- BodyGuardz UltraTough Clear Skins for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Wrapsol Original + Ultra Hybrid Protective Film for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- iBattz Mojo Removable Power Card Wallet
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Power View Pro S 2.1A Dual Charging Dock
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Universal Power View
- Sena Cases Florence Portfolio for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Mipow Power Tube 5500 + Power Tube Shake 2600
- Scosche Realm RH656m / RH656md Headphones
- Sena Cases Folio II for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Bowers & Wilkins P3 Headphones
Recent Articles
- iTunes TV show size totals don’t match actual disk storage
- Consolidating Multiple iTunes Libraries
- Converting Purchased Videos to 1080p HD
- Find My Friends always reports home location
- Creating an iTunes Match library from an external hard drive
- Benefits of keeping apps in iTunes when using iCloud
- Recovering iTunes from an External Hard Drive
- Normalizing volume levels for Voice Memos
- Replacement iPod nano not appearing in iTunes 9
- iOS Gems: ABC House, Kotomon, Luxor Evolved HD, N.O.V.A. 3 + Trucks HD


1
Intesting isn’t it?!
Mac mini might be “entry level”, but managers to perform like a “mid level” !
I am waiting for a trip to Singapore and I will purchase a 1.42 Ghz 80Gig with extra RAM, bluetooth and Superdrive.
Just wish you had an option for a Nvidia Graphics card like the powerbooks.
I’m guessing this would be possible? They seem the same size physically?
Anybody have any reports on upgrading the Graphics card on a mini? Is it possible? If so how?
This thing will become my main work station, and replace my crappy work PC as my main computer.
Posted by macdaddie in thailand on February 1, 2005 at 7:04 PM (PDT)
2
A graphics card upgrade of the Mini would to mere mortals be impossible, it’s all embedded into the motherboard so unless you could find another better chipset that would drop straight in to where the existing one is AND had the skills to desolder and resolder AND could hack the firmware of the Mini to accept the new chipset AND rewrote the driver to get it recognised .... when you crack open your new Mini you’ll see
For what the Mini is aimed at doing, the ATI 9200 is more than adequate, but I bet in 6-12months time an upgraded Mini will be available that has meatier graphics and CPU, and if/when the G5 PowerBooks come out a G5 Mini would only be a few months behind. For now Apple can happily sit back watch the Minis roll out and the cash roll in. (They certainly pursuaded me to sell the PC and get a Mini)
Posted by Mark Smith on February 22, 2005 at 10:52 AM (PDT)