Backstage: iLounge’s new grading system
Over more than a dozen years of professionally reviewing (and twenty years of reading about) consumer electronics products, I think I’ve seen just about every type of rating system ever devised. The most common involve four or five stars, icons, or key phrases, while others prefer 10-point scales, 100-point scales, or something in-between (such as 10-point scales with single-digit decimals).
Each system has its problems. What does a 73 out of 100 (or a 7.3 out of 10) really tell you about a product? Would your answer to that question change if the publication never awarded scores below, say, 50 (or 5.0)? And what is a 3.5-star product? Numerically, that’s the equivalent of a 70% rating… if you’re using a 5-star scale. On a 4-star scale, that’s an 87.5% rating. What does –that- mean when the only higher score you can get is 100%?
And I won’t even get into some of the cool but decidedly non-mainstream Asian rating systems I’ve seen – multi-factoral graphs with scores that visually resemble starbursts. There are unquestionably lots of ways to review products. The question is: which is best? My answer, and an early explanation of our new rating system, follow in the “Read More” box below.
Of all the scales I’ve ever used, my favorite remains the letter grade system, which is very easy for most of our readers to understand instantly (and intuitively because of school), even though it has the flexibility of a 13-point scale. For that reason, we’ve implemented letter grades on iLounge in place of our previous four-icon system. The new letter grade system works like this.
A+, A, and A- grades are awarded to only the very best products, ones that we would highly recommend. While an A- grade indicates one or two small deficiencies that limit the product’s universal appeal, an A+ grade indicates that the product is too good to be true – a useful and virtually universally appealing item, more than reasonably priced, that represents a major step forward without even small flaws. For reference, even the original iPod would not have received an A+ grade from iLounge. We haven’t awarded one yet, and would be surprised if we ever do.
B+ and B grades are awarded to very good and good products, ones that we would recommend only to specific audiences. A B+ grade indicates that the product may not be universally appealing because of certain small to medium design limitations, decisions, or flaws, but will likely provide great satisfaction to a specific narrow audience. A B grade denotes a product that will mostly satisfy a specific narrow audience.
A B- grade is on the fine edge of “good” and “recommendable.” It indicates a product that is better than average, but has a few medium to large issues that crimp its appeal. We would typically recommend a B- product only to people who really need its functionality.
C graded products are “okay” or “average” ones that we neither recommend nor dislike. They perform all of their stated functions acceptably, but may not be attractively designed, well thought out, or appropriately priced. A C+ grade indicates that the product was a little bit better than average, but still not “good” or “recommendable.” The C- grade indicates that the product was on the edge of being contemptable, and though it worked substantially as promised, possessed some serious design issues.
D graded products are ones that we actively disliked for some reason. Typically, that reason is that the product provided such substantially below-average design, performance or pricing that it was nearly laughable by comparison to other available offerings. It typically will be something that is rendered unfit for a major stated purpose because of poor design. A D+ indicates that the product could have been brought up to C level if a single major issue was fixed. A D- means that the product was close to historically terrible.
F graded products are loathsome. They were either pointless or dangerous when we tested them, or otherwise quite substantially failed to conform to their promised performance levels. We do not award F+ or F- grades; a flat F is considered “failing.” We reserve the right to award either D or F grades to products that we receive for review in defective or materially damaged condition, when we believe that such defects may also appear in products received by end-users.
In the near future, we will be retrofitting all of iLounge’s prior four-icon ratings with letter grades, and providing a much-requested report card for all of the products we’ve reviewed. For the most part, “Excited” icons will translate to A grades, “Happy” icons will translate to B grades, “It’s OK” icons will translate to C grades, and “Sad” icons will translate to D or F grades. (There may be a few exceptions.) We also will likely change the old words “Good” and “Bad” at the bottom of our reviews to the words “Pros” and “Cons” or something similar, because as products approach the A level, “Bad” becomes more like “nitpicks” than “serious issues.”
The purpose of these changes is to make iLounge reviews more useful to our readers, and since this is appearing on Backstage first, my hope is that you might share comments/suggestions/thoughts on these changes. Anyone? Bueller?
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods or accessories, or if you sell or market products, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators. Wondering why we're talking about something other than iPods? Check the Archives: Backstage has been here and kicking it since 2004.
- Apple releases iOS 10.0.2 to fix headphone controls, iCloud Photo Library
- Report: Apple’s Siri home hub has reached the prototype stage
- Apple acquires machine learning company Tuplejump
- Apple releases iOS 10.1 public beta
- iOS 10.1 beta adds ‘Portrait’ Depth of Field effect
- Apple releases first iOS 10.1, watchOS 3.1, tvOS 10.0.1 developer betas
- Report: Apple considering acquisition of high-performance car maker McLaren (Update: and Lit Motors)
- Google brings Allo messaging app to iOS
- Apple working on fix for Lightning EarPods glitch
- DisplayMate says iPhone 7 has the ‘best performing mobile LCD display’
- Thought Out Simplex Tablet iPad Stand
- SmartX Galaxy ZEGA Starter Kit
- Apple iPhone 7 Plus Leather Case
- Apple Watch Series 2
- iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus
- Twelve South HiRise 2 for iPhone + iPad
- Nomad Pod Pro for iPhone and Apple Watch
- Sevenhugs hugOne Sleep Monitoring System
- Kanex GoPower Watch Portable Battery for Apple Watch
- Nuvyyo Tablo Over-the-Air Television DVR
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of watchOS 3
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of tvOS 10
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iOS 10
- Inside the betas: iOS 10 Photos gets Advanced Computer Vision
- Inside the betas: iOS 10 Music app delivers ‘clarity and simplicity’
- Inside the betas: iOS 10 Maps gets a major redesign
- Inside the betas: iOS 10 shakes up the user experience
- Inside the betas: watchOS 3 promises a real speed boost
- Inside the betas: A sneak peek at what’s new in tvOS 10
- Filling the Gap: A look at third-party HomeKit apps