MacBook Air Sales, Decoded: “Successful,” Not “Thrilling,” Means… | iLounge Backstage


MacBook Air Sales, Decoded: “Successful,” Not “Thrilling,” Means…

Those accustomed to hearing Apple executives discuss sales performance of new products are familiar with certain restrictions: the company rarely breaks out model-by-model sales for individual new releases, instead issuing only broad sales figures for categories such as “Mac desktops,” “Mac portables,” “iPods,” and “iPhones.” Then, in quarterly conference calls with financial analysts, its executives talk about the figures with enthusiastic code phrases that might sound “smug” to casual listeners, but sometimes subtly signal how well the products are actually performing in the marketplace. Apple’s sale of 1.1 million iPhones during its first full quarter on the market? The company was “thrilled,” according to CFO Peter Oppenheimer. Apple’s opinion on the beginning of the iTunes Wi-Fi Music Store and then-new relationship with Starbucks? “Very pleased,” said Oppenheimer, in a phrase that is used with great frequency. Underperforming products? They tend not to get mentioned at all.

So where does the MacBook Air sit on this spectrum? It was “successful,” Oppenheimer said yesterday, and “customers have responded very well.” That sounds more like the light, standard enthusiasm Apple exhibited for the Starbucks deal than the “boom!” enthusiasm for the iPhone, right? Further quantification came around the 26:40 mark in the call, when an analyst from Goldman Sachs asked about potential revenue shortfalls for the next quarter.

“Our Mac channel inventory this past quarter did increase by about 60,000 in the March quarter,” revealed Oppenheimer, “as the result of the MacBook Air launch and accelerated sales velocity.” This is quite telling. Because of both the MacBook Air’s launch, and the growth of Mac sales in general, Apple—now increasingly good at conservatively managing its Mac inventory to respond to projected demand—has added 60,000 machines that are just waiting to be sold. Since Apple aims for approximately 4 weeks of channel inventory for Macs (3-4 weeks or 4-5 weeks is typical), if the MacBook Air alone had added 60,000 projected Mac sales in 4 weeks, that would suggest that Apple’s prepared to sell around 180,000 Airs per quarter.

However, that number is probably too high. Oppenheimer mentioned that the 60,000 unit bump also includes “accelerated sales velocity” for additional other Macs, both desktop and portable. Notably, though Mac sales grew both seasonally and from the year ago quarter, they were almost flat from Q1 2008 to Q2 2008 - 2.319 Million Macs versus 2.289 Million, or -1% growth from the prior quarter. In other words, total Macs manufactured and shipped into the channel were pretty close to the same from the prior quarter, even taking the launch of MacBook Air into account. We could guesstimate that 50,000 of Apple’s 60,000 increase came from MacBook Airs being added, which would put the Air at 150,000 per quarter. That’s probably still a little high, but maybe not, if the 60,000 number was closer to 3 weeks of channel inventory than 4.

Since Apple sold 1.433 million portable Macs during the quarter, and had MacBook Air on the market for only two of the three months in the quarter, 50,000 units per month would put estimated sales in the 100,000 range, with 60,000 units per month in the 120,000 range. That’s 7% to 8.4% of total portable Mac sales. For obvious reasons, such numbers would be “successful,” but not “thrilling.” Estimates of the size of the ultra-portable computer market peg it at around 10% or less of the total portable market, putting Air in line with expectations, not above it, with future growth expected to come from small, cheap machines like the Asus EEEPC.

There are two other related things worth noting. First, Apple’s television advertising campaign for the Air was extremely vigorous during the past quarter, with commercials airing multiple times during individual American Idol episodes, as well as across many other popular (and ad-expensive) shows. We’ve been wondering: how much could Apple have shaved off the price of each Air sold if it wasn’t advertising so aggressively, and would a lower price have alone triggered more sales?

Finally, we found it interesting that the iPod touch was described in the same terms as MacBook Air. Oppenheimer described the touch as a “success” and said that Apple is “very pleased,” without going into much greater detail about the flatness in iPod unit sales during a time when Apple has said that it’s shipping its best iPod lineup ever. Ten million more iPods in the quarter is fantastic by our yardstick, but we’re still crossing our fingers for “thrilling” new products in the near future.

Your thoughts, readers?

« Shrinking iPhone, Shrinking Interface: The Issues

iChat Video Problems + Solutions, or Don’t Return Your New Mac Yet »

Related Stories



If you wanted to juggle the numbers on iPods, you might include the iPhone for a total of over 12 mil. ipods sold…still a relatively flat growth number, perhaps, but somewhat better.  The iPhone is an odd item in the apple mix that way - it’s an iPod as well as a phone, but the numbers don’t take that into account.

Posted by domArch on April 24, 2008 at 11:06 AM (CDT)


i think you misread the significance of the high tv ad exposure for the Air. The Air is Apple’s current flagship product. These are not just ads for the Air, by showing the most interesting and newest Mac they are in fact advertising the complete Mac platform.

Posted by dmw on April 25, 2008 at 8:19 AM (CDT)


I don’t know if Apple would call the Air a flagship product—in fact, it never has. It’s new and different, and destined to be a third-place seller to the MacBook and MacBook Pro. Whether that’s worth advertising over more widely appealing models is a judgment call.

Posted by Jeremy Horwitz in East Amherst, NY, USA on April 25, 2008 at 12:29 PM (CDT)


I think that they will continue to promote the air until they beleive enough people are aware of the air as an option for them

Posted by Phill on April 25, 2008 at 3:23 PM (CDT)


I’d have to say it’s not realistic to compare Q1 numbers (Christmas) to Q2 numbers. All you can really do is compare year ago to year ago to year ago quarters- an in this respect Apple is doing great, year over year over year, over year.

Posted by macbones on April 30, 2008 at 10:26 PM (CDT)


One of the many things that makes Apple different, is it delivers results not promises.

We could probably use much more of the corporate behavior modeled by Apple every quarter.

Posted by Michael Langfur on May 1, 2008 at 8:46 AM (CDT)


I heard that the New York Museum of Modern Art is preparing a space for the MacBook Air, right next to the Mac Cube.

Posted by TheSnarkmeister on May 2, 2008 at 1:53 PM (CDT)

If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods or accessories, or if you sell or market products, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators. Wondering why we're talking about something other than iPods? Check the Archives: Backstage has been here and kicking it since 2004.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
iLounge Weekly

Recent News

Recent Reviews

Recent Articles

Sign up for the iLounge Weekly Newsletter

iLounge is an independent resource for all things iPod, iPhone, iPad, and beyond.
iPod, iPhone, iPad, iTunes, Apple TV, Mac, and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc.
iLounge is © 2001 - 2019 iLounge, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy