News
Analyst: AT&T paying Apple $18/month per iPhone
By Charles Starrett
Senior Editor, iLounge
Published: Wednesday, October 31, 2007
News Category: iPhone
In a recent note, Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster said he estimates AT&T is paying Apple an average of $18/month for each iPhone subscriber, or $432 over the course of a two-year contract. Munster revised his previous estimate of $6.50/month based on iPhone sales and revenue figures disclosed in Apple’s fourth quarter earnings report. Munster explained that he was surprised by the higher estimate, and said that it showed the importance of Apple’s efforts to keep the iPhone out of unlockers’ hands. Apple recently instituted a new iPhone purchase policy, limiting sales to two per person and barring cash sales in an effort to reduce the threat of unlockers. Based on the estimate, Muenster boosted his Apple 2009 revenue estimate to $42.8 billion, and raised his price target on Apple from $220 to $250.
Related Stories
- Apple sued over iPhone, Apple TV wireless interaction
- AT&T doubles upgrade fee to $36
- Apple sues Motorola in U.S. over Qualcomm patents
- Apple airs new Siri-focused iPhone 4S ads
- Apple asks European standards body to set Frand rules
- iPhone accounts for 40% of new Sprint customers in Q4 2011
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Apple to offer audio stream of presentation by CEO Cook
- Apple nabs top spot in corporate reputation study
- Rokform debuts Rokbed Fuzion for iPhone 4/4S
- NPD: Apple top electronics brand of 2011
- Incase teams with Shepard Fairey on iPhone case
- Apple sued over iPhone, Apple TV wireless interaction
- Apple exec Cue accepts Grammy honoring Steve Jobs
- ThinkGeek intros iCade 8-bitty game controller
- Apple requests audits of Foxconn by FLA
- Apple sues Samsung, seeks to block Galaxy Nexus in U.S.
Recent Reviews
- Cygnett Metalicus for iPhone 4/4S
- Cygnett Platform Universal Tablet Stand
- Cygnett FlexiView Adjustable Stand for iPad
- FLOS / Philippe Starck D’E-light
- Twelve South HoverBar for iPad 2
- Cygnett Apollo for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! ID for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! With Stand for iPhone 4/4S
- Solid Line Products RightShift 2 Removable Keyboard Case for iPad 2
Recent Articles
- iOS Gems: Adventures of Tintin, Reckless Racing 2 + Scramble With Friends
- Ask iLounge 2-3-12
- Making The Case For - And Against - An Apple iTV Television
- Instant Expert: iTunes U for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iBooks 2.0
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: Honorable Mentions
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: iPod, iPhone, iPad + Mac
- iOS Gems: Bug Princess, Dora Hops Into Phonics, It’s A Small World, Sleepy Jack + X Is For X-Ray
- The Complete Guide to Managing iTunes Videos
- Editorial: As CES Grows, Will Microsoft’s Loss Be Apple’s Gain?
1
Clearly, Apple couldn’t give a s__t about the realities of GSM-based mobile device. For example, selling it unlocked and keeping its OS general enough as to be independent of the operator.
Posted by The Doctor on October 31, 2007 at 10:59 AM (PDT)
2
Doc ... so what? Apple is a business and the purpose of a business is to look after its bottom line and its shareholders. They’re a company I like, a company whose products I like and have bought for 22 years and a company that is at least dedicated to product quality, innovation and uniqueness. Again, I ask, so what?
Capitalism! Gotta love it, baby.
Posted by jla3bc on October 31, 2007 at 3:31 PM (PDT)
3
The point is, it’s a ridiculous strategy relying on carrier kickbacks for a GSM phone. No other phone manufacturer does this; they don’t need to do so.
Case in point: Nokia has almost half the world’s marketshare of mobile devices. They’ve happily achieved this by selling their phones completely unlocked and unbranded - even in the US, now. (Just look at the N95.)
Posted by The Doctor on November 2, 2007 at 7:00 AM (PDT)