News
Apple in legal dispute with Burst over digital media patents
Burst.com, which develops video and audio delivery software, said it was sued by Apple on Wednesday for declaratory relief, alleging patent invalidity or non-infringement. The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, follows “a breakdown in protracted negotiations for issuance of a license of Burst’s patents to cover Apple’s iPod and iTunes products,” according to the company.
“Burst anticipates responding to the complaint and filing a counterclaim for patent infringement shortly,” the company said in a statement late Thursday. “Burst remains committed to the enforcement of its intellectual property and looks forward to successfully resolving this litigation through a license covering Apple’s Quicktime, iPod and iTunes products, including Apple’s iTunes Music Store.”
In March of last year Burst settled a major patent and antitrust suit against Microsoft. The software giant paid Burst $60 million to license its patents. “Since the Microsoft settlement, the company has been in patent licensing discussions with several companies engaged in the distribution of audio and video content on computer networks,” Burst said.
Related Stories
- Apple, Samsung CEOs meet for talks
- Foxconn building new $210M Apple production line
- Apple’s NC data center to switch to renewable energy
- New HTC handsets face import delay due to Apple
- Apple rebrands third-gen iPad with Wi-Fi + 4G
- iCloud.com beta site reveals Notes, Reminders access
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Incase intros Book Jacket Revolution for iPad
- Apple, Samsung CEOs meet for talks
- Foxconn building new $210M Apple production line
- iLounge Weekly arriving Monday, giveaway update
- DataMan update adds per-app data usage tracking
- National Geographic releases Look & Learn Animals
- Art Authority updated with Retina Display graphics
- iSkin rolls out Fuze, Fuze SE for iPhone 4, 4S
- Foodspotting adds new Place and Profile pages
- IK Multimedia ships iRig Mix
Recent Reviews
- Mipow Power Tube 5500 + Power Tube Shake 2600
- Scosche Realm RH656m / RH656md Headphones
- Sena Cases Folio II for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Bowers & Wilkins P3 Headphones
- iBattz Mojo Treble Keychain Cable with Card Reader
- Hex Code Folio for iPad 2 + iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Moshi Origo for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Moshi Concerti for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Booq Folio for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Camalen Vision for iPad (3rd-Gen)
Recent Articles
- Find My Friends always reports home location
- Creating an iTunes Match library from an external hard drive
- Benefits of keeping apps in iTunes when using iCloud
- Recovering iTunes from an External Hard Drive
- Normalizing volume levels for Voice Memos
- Replacement iPod nano not appearing in iTunes 9
- iOS Gems: ABC House, Kotomon, Luxor Evolved HD, N.O.V.A. 3 + Trucks HD
- Audiobooks and iTunes Match
- Consolidating apps to a single iTunes Store account
- Tracking down phantom Podcasts in iTunes
1
Interesting…can’t agree on a price, even after all that time negotiating? Then sue the a** off the other guy and hope the courts find in your favor. What’s that argument, again? We’re Apple, the ‘GOOD’ guys, and therefore we shouldn’t be bothered with paltry things like patent infringements; however, we’re not sure if it’s non-infringement or invalid patents, so we’ll sue for one or the other. Please, Your Honor, select what you feel is best (for us).
Also interesting that MSFT didn’t bother to fight and just settled with Burst.
Posted by flatline response on January 6, 2006 at 3:46 AM (PDT)
2
Wow, this is BIG news! It means Apple IS working on a streaming movie store, as that’s what the Burst patents are about, streaming media.
Posted by KenC on January 6, 2006 at 4:10 AM (PDT)
3
Good deduction kenc. We just might have a pay per play movie network on iTunes in the next 2 years
Posted by Jonathan Keim on January 6, 2006 at 5:51 AM (PDT)
4
@flatline response
The interesting thing is that Burst apparently holds a patent on streaming audio/video over a network. Something that I remember doing in the late 80s/early 90s.
As for Apple suing for both non-infringment or invalid, that’s normal. Basically what they’re saying is that they don’t believe the patent is valid, but even if the court determines that it is, they don’t believe they are infringing on the patent. If they don’t sue for both, they’d loose the opportunity to sue for the other one if they lost because both are directly related to the same action, so they are required to be litigated together.
Posted by Theo on January 6, 2006 at 6:49 AM (PDT)