News
Apple purchased map company Placebase in July
By Charles Starrett
Senior Editor, iLounge
Published: Thursday, October 1, 2009
News Category: Apple
Apple has quietly purchased mapping service Placebase and its accompanying Pushpin API, hinting that the company may be planning to use the assets should it need to replace Google Maps in several of its applications, such as the Maps application on the iPhone and iPod touch. Citing a Twitter update from the founder of openplaces.org, which used the Pushpin API in its software, along with an updated LinkedIn profile for Placebase CEO Jaron Waldman, who is now listed as part of the “Geo Team” at Apple, Computerworld reports that Apple purchased the company in July, and suggests that the company may be looking to replace Google Maps in its products in an effort to further reduce dependency on Google. Although Google Maps offers advanced features like Street View, Placebase offered a wide variety of customizations and features that integrated both public and private data sets, and the Pushpin API, which offered an easy way to layer data onto the maps. Despite the article’s strong suggestions, it is possible Apple purchased the company for reasons unrelated to its relationship with Google, such as bringing in more talent for development of more advanced map- and location-based services.
Related Stories
- Motorola loses third patent case against Apple in Germany
- Apple airs new Siri-focused iPhone 4S ads
- German court rejects Apple bid to ban Galaxy 10.1N
- Apple asks European standards body to set Frand rules
- Key iPhone, iPod executive left Apple last year
- Apple eyeing Sam’s Club for store-within-a-store locations?
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly coming early Monday, giveaway reminder
- iBackFlip launches Somersault case for iPad
- Motorola loses third patent case against Apple in Germany
- Apple rushing to pick demo apps for next iPad launch
- Apple airs new Siri-focused iPhone 4S ads
- Periscope Audio Lab releases SpaceSampler
- Evernote Hello improves contact entry features
- eMailGanizer Pro adds Universal Inbox, Smart Folders
- Scosche rolls out bassDock for iPad
- German court rejects Apple bid to ban Galaxy 10.1N
Recent Reviews
- Cygnett Apollo for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! ID for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! With Stand for iPhone 4/4S
- Solid Line Products RightShift 2 Removable Keyboard Case for iPad 2
- Spigen SGP Kuel F60Q Battery Pack
- Just Mobile Highway + Highway Pro for iPod, iPhone + iPad
- Speck CandyShell and CandyShell Satin for iPhone 4/4S
- Jensen JiPS-310i Docking Speaker for iPod, iPhone & iPad
- FrappeDesign Smart Sleeve for iPad 2
Recent Articles
- iOS Gems: Adventures of Tintin, Reckless Racing 2 + Scramble With Friends
- Ask iLounge 2-3-12
- Making The Case For - And Against - An Apple iTV Television
- Instant Expert: iTunes U for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iBooks 2.0
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: Honorable Mentions
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: iPod, iPhone, iPad + Mac
- iOS Gems: Bug Princess, Dora Hops Into Phonics, It’s A Small World, Sleepy Jack + X Is For X-Ray
- The Complete Guide to Managing iTunes Videos
- Editorial: As CES Grows, Will Microsoft’s Loss Be Apple’s Gain?


1
I suppose it makes good corporate sense for Apple to buy and own software and hardware companies. Google in some ways is a competitor to Apple. Yet, I wonder if Apple wouldn’t be better off in the long run to embrace some possible competitors, even encourage them as long as they keep developing for Apple platforms. As a long-time Mac user, I remember a time when developers of software and hardware avoided Apple-based products. I am not sure, given Apple’s growth, that could happen again, but I would hate to go back to the dearth of support Apple used to get just a few years ago.
Posted by Steve on October 1, 2009 at 8:08 AM (PDT)
2
Google is more than “in some ways” a competitor. If Android based smartphones are well received, that will make Google Apple’s number one competitor in Apple’s only major growth area.
Still, I agree that Apple shouldn’t alienate the standards the public is going to want unless they’re absolutely certain the can do a better job in-house and without resorting to the sort of protectionist application approval process they’ve been showing signs of over the past year. If the iPhone OS becomes perceived as yet another Apple centric sandbox rather than one where all developers are equally received, they’ll be knocking at other doors soon enough.
Posted by Code Monkey in Midstate New York on October 1, 2009 at 9:24 AM (PDT)
3
Android smartphones are already well-received but I don’t think that makes Google Apple’s number one competitor. Apple is a hardware company first, a software company second. They make money selling hardware. That being the case I don’t think its a clear-cut case of Google vs. Apple in the phone arena since Google only makes the OS which the phone companies then modify (see the HTC Hero). I think the more important piece is the App Store. None of the other platforms have something similar and until they do I don’t think the sales numbers will be comparable.
Posted by Jason on October 1, 2009 at 10:37 AM (PDT)
4
Yeah cause google is an ad company.
Posted by W on October 2, 2009 at 3:49 AM (PDT)
5
“Android smartphones are already well-received but I don’t think that makes Google Apple’s number one competitor. Apple is a hardware company first, a software company second. They make money selling hardware.”
Wow, so if phones featuring the Android OS begin to gain significant market share, that doesn’t affect Apple? You are smoking the good stuff. Apple is not a hardware or software company, they’re both. You can not buy Apple hardware and run anything you want on it and you can’t buy (most) Apple software and run it on anything, the two are typically inextricably linked, and the iPhone is definitely an example of such a bonded product. Moreso, the chief selling point to the iPhone OS products is their 85,000 and growing applications compared to the relatively stagnant Symbian and Blackberry markets.
Sell more Android based hardware, Apple is growing their own market share less quickly. Sell enough Android based hardware, Apple is selling less of their own hardware. Sell enough Android based hardware and its much more open applications environment attracts as many or more developers as the iPhone OS and Apple’s product becomes less appealing compared to the competition.
And keep in mind, the iPhone is Apple’s only significantly *growing* market. The “plain” iPods are stable compared to the total market. The computing market is likewise stable compared to the total market (its minor increase in relative sales recently is nice - and involves a bunch of deliberate data omission, but it doesn’t change the world wide install base of the different platforms - at this pace of “growth”, Apple will capture a whole 20% of desktop computers sometime well into the next century). Nope, the iPhone with its subscriber fees and high priced hardware and application revenue and developer fees is Apple biggest growth division and that which threatens it is Apple’s biggest competitor in any real sense.
Posted by Code Monkey in Midstate New York on October 2, 2009 at 6:12 AM (PDT)