Apple rejects book app for ‘objectionable content’ | iLounge News

2014 iPad iPhone iPod Buyers' Guide from


Apple rejects book app for ‘objectionable content’

Author's pic

By Charles Starrett

Contributing Editor
Published: Monday, December 22, 2008
News Categories: Apps + Games

Apple recently rejected an iPhone-based version of a book because it contained foul language. Citing a clause in the iPhone SDK that states “applications must not contain any obscene, pornographic, offensive or defamatory content or materials of any kind (text, graphics, images, photographs, etc.), or other content or materials that in Apple’s reasonable judgement (sic) may be found objectionable by iPhone or iPod touch users,” Apple rejected Knife Music by David Carnoy, going so far as to provide a sample of one particularly graphic section. Alex Brie, developer of the application, believes Apple is checking for such content using word-matching software because it would be difficult to believe that Apple has staff with the time to manually read each book submitted. “Apple’s staff shouldn’t be allowed to refuse to publish works of literature based only on word matching. Even more, what would happen if I (a Romanian) would publish an ebook filled with Romanian obscenities? - would Apple’s staff need to learn Romanian…and read the entire ebook…to make sure this doesn’t happen?” Brie said. Apple offers both movies and music on the iTunes Store containing similar language to that found in Carnoy’s book, although in those cases it is able to either mark the content explicit or rely on the MPAA’s movie ratings; there is no equivalent ratings system for books.

« App devs blast extended Apple delays, “amateur” support

Equinux announces Live TV television app for iPhone »

Related Stories



Get over it. If you don’t like what Apple does, go elsewhere.

Posted by Dennis on December 22, 2008 at 11:13 AM (PDT)


Wow, seriously Dennis?  I think it’s ridiculous that the application can’t just be marked “EXPLICIT” and call it a day.  Although then there would be complaints about how Apple labels applications as explicit.

But I don’t agree with this unorthodox rejection.

Posted by Michael on December 22, 2008 at 2:27 PM (PDT)


I thought apps could be rated mature or something.

Posted by John on December 22, 2008 at 5:06 PM (PDT)


“Judgement” and “judgment” are both valid spellings.

Posted by Andrew on December 22, 2008 at 7:42 PM (PDT)

If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.


Recent News

Recent Reviews

Recent Articles

Shop for Accessories: Cases, speakers, chargers, etc.