News
Apple rejects newspaper-reading app over content
By Charles Starrett
Senior Editor, iLounge
Published: Monday, May 4, 2009
News Category: iPhone Applications
Apple has rejected Makayama’s iPhone application Newspaper(s) due to objectionable content. Newspaper is an app for the iPhone and iPod touch that will let users to read 50 national and international newspapers, including the New York Times, Frankfurter Algemeine and El Pais. The application was rejected due to content found in the Page 3 section of UK-based tabloid The Sun, which contains images of topless women. In the rejection message, Apple noted that Parental Controls have been announced for iPhone Os 3.0, adding that it “would be appropriate to resubmit your application for review once this feature is available.” Makayama has since removed The Sun from the application’s database of papers and resubmitted the application; Newspaper(s) is now available for $1.
Next: iPhone tops J.D. Power's smartphone ratings, battery knocked
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Enter the CES Exhibits Plus Pass Giveaway today
- Wider distribution boosting iPhone sales in France
- Chinon rolls out AVi portable iPod speaker
- TomTom intros separate Car Kit for iPod touch
- iLounge and MusicSkins announce the Ultimate Design Contest
- Latest edition of iPodweek coming shortly
- Apple planning more iPod touch apps for retail?
- Gameloft, others cutting back on Android development
- Google launches Google News for iPhone, iPod touch
- Magellan releases RoadMate app, Car Kit coming
Recent Reviews
- Electronic Arts Command & Conquer Red Alert
- Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin Mini
- iHome iHM79 Rechargeable Mini Speakers
- Elexa Consumer Products iBlink
- Bose SoundDock 10
- Shure SE115m+ Sound Isolating Headset
- Apple Remote (2009)
- Kensington Travel Battery Pack and Charger for iPhone
- Tapulous Metallica Revenge
- Electronic Arts NBA Live by EA Sports
Recent Articles
- The Complete Guide to Using the iTunes Store
- iPhone Gems: Brain Challenge 2, Impossible Quiz, Jeopardy, Trivia Wars + Wheel of Fortune
- The Complete Guide to Album Tagging, Art and Playlists in iTunes
- Ask iLounge 11-13-09
- The Complete Guide to iTunes Audiobooks, Podcasts + iTunes U
- Ask iLounge 11-6-09
- iPhone Gems: Asphalt 5 and Doom Classic
- Ask iLounge 10-30-09
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of Apple TV 3.0
- Ask iLounge 10-23-09

1
this is getting idiotic, just like the NIN app rejection because it had an NIN’s song in it with a bad word… when they offer the entire NIN catalog in iTunes for anyone to buy…
Posted by Marshall on May 4, 2009 at 2:17 PM (PDT)
2
There’s plenty of other retarded applications out there that Apple allows, who the heck went through all 50 newspapers and found that 1 article, when it changes daily.
Posted by ReyZero on May 4, 2009 at 3:38 PM (PDT)
3
Actually, while the print content of page 3 changes daily, there is always a topless woman. Page 3 is an icon of British, ah-hrm, ‘culture’...
Posted by Ash on May 4, 2009 at 3:53 PM (PDT)
4
but the baby-shaker was approved without question
Posted by Brock on May 4, 2009 at 6:05 PM (PDT)
5
Frankfurter A_LL_gemeine. double ll pls
Posted by ben on May 4, 2009 at 8:18 PM (PDT)
6
i just found pictures of naked ladies on mobile safari! somebody needs to tell apple quick, so this won’t happen again! won’t somebody please think of the children?
Posted by Pete on May 5, 2009 at 10:49 AM (PDT)
7
However, what is not mentioned is that iPhone OS 2 has built in parental controls for music/movies and the ability to disallow access to mobile safari. They aren’t rejecting applications on a whim, they’re just trying to cover their ### so that parents can’t get upset when their child finds that they can use an app to get around the parent’s safeguards. I can’t blame them, nor can I see how you can.
Posted by chad on May 6, 2009 at 5:54 PM (PDT)
8
Why would you pay for a list of bookmarks. The app only leads you to the web site of each newspaper. It’s nit even worth being a free app, let alone anyone paying for it.
Posted by Steve on May 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM (PDT)