News
Apple requires app download before allowing App Store review
By Charles Starrett
Senior Editor, iLounge
Published: Monday, September 29, 2008
News Category: Apps + Games
Apple has quietly changed the App Store’s review policy, now requiring users to have actually downloaded or purchased an application before they are allowed to review it. This improvement has been long-requested by developers, who at times saw the ratings on their apps drop due to negative reviews from users who had never even used the application. Now, if a user attempts to review an application that they haven’t used, they are greeted by an alert explaining, “In order to write a Customer Review for this item you must have purchased or downloaded it.” [via TUAW]
Related Stories
- Periscope Audio Lab releases SpaceSampler
- Evernote Hello improves contact entry features
- eMailGanizer Pro adds Universal Inbox, Smart Folders
- Galaxy on Fire 2 HD update opens the Kaamo Club
- Smartr Contacts adds e-mail viewing support
- Path releases update to address contact privacy issue
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly coming early Monday, giveaway reminder
- iBackFlip launches Somersault case for iPad
- Motorola loses third patent case against Apple in Germany
- Apple rushing to pick demo apps for next iPad launch
- Apple airs new Siri-focused iPhone 4S ads
- Periscope Audio Lab releases SpaceSampler
- Evernote Hello improves contact entry features
- eMailGanizer Pro adds Universal Inbox, Smart Folders
- Scosche rolls out bassDock for iPad
- German court rejects Apple bid to ban Galaxy 10.1N
Recent Reviews
- Cygnett Apollo for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! ID for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! With Stand for iPhone 4/4S
- Solid Line Products RightShift 2 Removable Keyboard Case for iPad 2
- Spigen SGP Kuel F60Q Battery Pack
- Just Mobile Highway + Highway Pro for iPod, iPhone + iPad
- Speck CandyShell and CandyShell Satin for iPhone 4/4S
- Jensen JiPS-310i Docking Speaker for iPod, iPhone & iPad
- FrappeDesign Smart Sleeve for iPad 2
Recent Articles
- iOS Gems: Adventures of Tintin, Reckless Racing 2 + Scramble With Friends
- Ask iLounge 2-3-12
- Making The Case For - And Against - An Apple iTV Television
- Instant Expert: iTunes U for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iBooks 2.0
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: Honorable Mentions
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: iPod, iPhone, iPad + Mac
- iOS Gems: Bug Princess, Dora Hops Into Phonics, It’s A Small World, Sleepy Jack + X Is For X-Ray
- The Complete Guide to Managing iTunes Videos
- Editorial: As CES Grows, Will Microsoft’s Loss Be Apple’s Gain?
1
Hallelujah!
Posted by Galley in Greenville, SC on September 29, 2008 at 7:18 AM (PDT)
2
Great change. Maybe now we can start to see some useful reviews for software that isn’t free. It seemed like most of the paid apps were flooded with one star reviews from people complaining that it wasn’t free.
Posted by Mark on September 29, 2008 at 7:21 AM (PDT)
3
Makes much more sense. I wish though Apple would maintain its standards and prevent utterly useless apps from making their way to the App Store.
Posted by ramasaurus on September 29, 2008 at 9:35 AM (PDT)
4
This is a good change. I’ve read some of the reviews before purchase and found way to many reviews from people that have never used the app but gave it a not so good rating. I hate reading reviews from people that have never used the product they’re reviewing.
Posted by Audrey McGirt on September 29, 2008 at 10:42 AM (PDT)
5
Maybe allow non-owners of the app to leave comments only, with no review rating?
Posted by Steve on September 29, 2008 at 10:49 AM (PDT)
6
At last! Maybe the reviews will actually be well-informed reviews, rather than endless 1-star “to expansive” and “shud be free” drivel that currently plague most applications review pages. I don’t understand why this wasn’t implemented from the start.
Non-owners should be able to leave nothing. No comments. No reviews. Nothing.
Posted by TexCub on September 29, 2008 at 3:37 PM (PDT)
7
#5 Steve, why in the world should someone who doesn’t own the app be allowed to comment on it? No one is interested in reading these type of comments. Maybe you’re part of the problem?
Posted by HB on September 30, 2008 at 2:10 PM (PDT)
8
now if apple could just find a way to keep the developers away from leaving a comment/review. some of them are soooo obvious. but it’s a good start. nothing worse than seeing some ##### put up one star and only say “first”
Posted by john on September 30, 2008 at 2:37 PM (PDT)
9
===#5 Steve, why in the world should someone who doesn’t own the app be allowed to comment on it? No one is interested in reading these type of comments. Maybe you’re part of the problem?===
Posted by HB on September 30, 2008 at 2:10 PM (PDT)
I agree with Steve. Comments (but no star rating) should be allowed and for this reason. I have seen well-meaning posters (who didn’t give 1 star just to complain) who have suggested either a lower price or a certain feature be added before willing to buy. On several occasions, I’ve seen prices on apps lowered when a lot of people comment about that. Because, let’s face it. A lot of app developers are “optimistic” on what their app is worth.
Posted by Dale Reeck on October 1, 2008 at 5:13 AM (PDT)