News
Apple sued over iPhone eBook promotion
A new lawsuit has been filed against Apple for promoting the iPhone as a touchscreen book reader. MONEC Holding Ltd of Switzerland has filed a seven-page complaint in a Virginia district court, accusing Apple of patent infringement, unfair trade practices, monopolization, and tortious interference, relating to MONEC’s 2002 patent titled “Electronic device, preferably an electronic book.” The patent describes an electronic device with a touchscreen LCD display, having the “dimensions such that [...] approximately one page of a book can be illustrated at normal size, this display being integrated in a flat, frame-like housing.” MONEC argues that Apple is “well aware” of its patent and that the iPhone maker’s infringement has caused injury to its property and business, which it hopes to reclaim as damages; the company is also seeking attorney’s fees and an injunction preventing Apple from further infringement.
Related Stories
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Tweetbot adds Nearby tweets, Keyword mute filters + more
- Facebook releases Facebook Camera
- Bump adds photo to computer transfers
- Sharp to supply tech for Foxconn iPhone display plant
- Infinity Blade II: Vault of Tears update released
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Pulp adds iCloud sync, new Home Page
- WordPress for iOS adds Push Notifications
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Apple device poll ends, computing poll begins
- Fruit Ninja adds new features and power-ups
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Third-gen iPad to launch in Guam, Philippines May 29
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
- Panic releases Diet Coda
- Booq rolls out new Folio for iPad
Recent Reviews
- Pelican i1075 Hardback Case for iPad
- Skinit Skins for iPad (3rd-Generation)
- Spigen SGP Steinheil Ultra Optics Screen Protector for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- ZeroChroma VarioProtect for iPhone 4/4S
- BodyGuardz UltraTough Clear Skins for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Wrapsol Original + Ultra Hybrid Protective Film for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- iBattz Mojo Removable Power Card Wallet
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Power View Pro S 2.1A Dual Charging Dock
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Universal Power View
- Sena Cases Florence Portfolio for iPad (3rd-Gen)
Recent Articles
- Removing music from iTunes after copying to iPod
- iOS Gems: Farm 123, Facebook Camera, Scribblenauts, Shoot the Zombirds + Virtua Tennis Challenge
- iTunes TV show size totals don’t match actual disk storage
- Consolidating Multiple iTunes Libraries
- Converting Purchased Videos to 1080p HD
- Find My Friends always reports home location
- Creating an iTunes Match library from an external hard drive
- Benefits of keeping apps in iTunes when using iCloud
- Recovering iTunes from an External Hard Drive
- Normalizing volume levels for Voice Memos


1
Shouldn’t they be suing the software developers? Apple hasn’t made any applications that do such. At least not that I am aware of.
Posted by qphayes on March 24, 2009 at 2:44 PM (PDT)
2
I hope this lawsuit doesn’t sick. I mean seriously, the guys at star trek I least took the effort to build a mock up of such a device back in the 80’s. I don’t see them suing.
Posted by jay on March 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM (PDT)
3
That definition of e-book reader needs to be revisited. An e-book reader doesn’t have to be the size of a sheet of paper. An e-book reader should be something that reads e-books, hence the name. There have been so many cases against apple recently, it is ridiculous.
Posted by Dan on March 24, 2009 at 6:32 PM (PDT)
4
Are they suing Amazon for its Kindle as well? An iPhone is a blank slate for all kinds of applications.
Posted by TulsaGent in Tulsa, OK, USA on March 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM (PDT)
5
Hmmm - their patent sounds awfully like a tablet PC running Acrobat reader…..
or a Palm Tungsten running Acrobat…..
or a iPaq running acrobat….
Just wait for Windows to introduce touch screen support. Then, a 20” LCD monitor will fall into the trap - a touch screen LCD mounted in a frame.
I hope lawyers realise that ALL LCDs are “integrated in a flat, frame-like housing”.
What rubbish!!
Bring back the lawsuits about smiley faces, and the Shift key!!!
Posted by Gary on March 24, 2009 at 8:45 PM (PDT)
6
The quote describing the device would apply very well to a 1997 Apple Newton Messagepad 2100 and it’s built-in bookreader software.
Posted by otaku on March 25, 2009 at 6:06 AM (PDT)
7
This is completely silly; there’s way too much prior art.
The Rocket eBook was released in 1998. They filed in 1999. I think they have no case.
Posted by ckd on March 25, 2009 at 12:44 PM (PDT)
8
I agree with the general sentiment here. This sounds an awful lot like a money grab by a patent troll. I wonder if the Apple’s own Newton with bookreader software could be considered “prior art”. I would hope that Apple’s legals are looking into that.
Posted by SkiBumMSP on March 25, 2009 at 4:57 PM (PDT)