News
Apple sued over iPhone keyboard
St. Petersburg, Fla.-based SP Technologies has filed suit against Apple, alleging that the iPhone’s touchscreen-based keyboard violates an SP patent. The suit claims “Apple has infringed, and is now infringing” the patent “through the use, sale, [and] offer for sale of its iPhone product and system.” The patent, U.S. patent number 6,784,873 B1, describes a “method and medium for a computer readable keyboard display incapable of user termination.” Physician Peter V. Boesen is listed as the inventor. Boesen was sentenced to prison in May after being convicted of defrauding Iowa’s Medicare and Medicaid programs by filing false claims, but is currently free pending an appeal.
Related Stories
- Apple airs new Siri-focused iPhone 4S ads
- Apple asks European standards body to set Frand rules
- iPhone accounts for 40% of new Sprint customers in Q4 2011
- Key iPhone, iPod executive left Apple last year
- Motorola sought lucrative royalty on iPhone, iPad sales
- AT&T explains ‘unlimited data’ user throttling, blames users?
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly coming early Monday, giveaway reminder
- iBackFlip launches Somersault case for iPad
- Motorola loses third patent case against Apple in Germany
- Apple rushing to pick demo apps for next iPad launch
- Apple airs new Siri-focused iPhone 4S ads
- Periscope Audio Lab releases SpaceSampler
- Evernote Hello improves contact entry features
- eMailGanizer Pro adds Universal Inbox, Smart Folders
- Scosche rolls out bassDock for iPad
- German court rejects Apple bid to ban Galaxy 10.1N
Recent Reviews
- Cygnett Apollo for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! ID for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! With Stand for iPhone 4/4S
- Solid Line Products RightShift 2 Removable Keyboard Case for iPad 2
- Spigen SGP Kuel F60Q Battery Pack
- Just Mobile Highway + Highway Pro for iPod, iPhone + iPad
- Speck CandyShell and CandyShell Satin for iPhone 4/4S
- Jensen JiPS-310i Docking Speaker for iPod, iPhone & iPad
- FrappeDesign Smart Sleeve for iPad 2
Recent Articles
- iOS Gems: Adventures of Tintin, Reckless Racing 2 + Scramble With Friends
- Ask iLounge 2-3-12
- Making The Case For - And Against - An Apple iTV Television
- Instant Expert: iTunes U for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iBooks 2.0
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: Honorable Mentions
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: iPod, iPhone, iPad + Mac
- iOS Gems: Bug Princess, Dora Hops Into Phonics, It’s A Small World, Sleepy Jack + X Is For X-Ray
- The Complete Guide to Managing iTunes Videos
- Editorial: As CES Grows, Will Microsoft’s Loss Be Apple’s Gain?
1
i say he should go after ATM machines then, you don’t get a choice to not use those on screen keypads. or, better yet, the patent office should stop giving disgustingly vague patents. i think i’m going to patent “a device that allows the user to see data through electronic means” then sue every tv and computer manufacturer.
i’m tired of our government wasting our money on these fools. especially one that is directly responsible for the downfall and collapse of our health system and has already stolen from the government.
Posted by RedRavenWing on August 6, 2007 at 9:25 AM (PDT)
2
there really is no Sp Technologies, it is just a bunch of lawyers that prey on big offs and lame patents
lawyers are the lowest form of life (well at least ones like these)
Posted by hydra-calm on August 6, 2007 at 9:32 AM (PDT)
3
Another chance to squash some utter vague, stupid, and completely obvious patent. “Hey, I made something that looks like a folder on a computer screen; I should patent that!” Geez. Let’s round up all these patent trolls and have a bonfire.
Posted by TizzyD on August 6, 2007 at 10:03 AM (PDT)
4
I think I will sue SP Technologies for infringing on my patent for a method of making lots of money from lame and vague patents.
Posted by Rob on August 6, 2007 at 10:21 AM (PDT)
5
woow that made my day,.. another good joke of a good joker….lol
Posted by dennis on August 6, 2007 at 5:17 PM (PDT)
6
===Boesen was sentenced to prison in May after being convicted of defrauding Iowa’s Medicare and Medicaid programs by filing false claims===
Well, as long as the patent claimer is an upstandiung citizen
Posted by Dale Reeck on August 7, 2007 at 5:21 AM (PDT)
7
It’s funny that along with every great device that Apple introduces, there’s someone who tries to sue the company because they “already invented” a technology it uses. What hogwash. It’s also odd that the iPhone was introduced in January, but we’ve not heard of this lawsuit until now.
Posted by Austin on August 7, 2007 at 7:41 AM (PDT)
8
The iPhone wasn’t sold until last month. You can’t sue somebody for a product they’re talking about—only one they’re selling.
Either way, the patent features the following phrase: “The input area has no task bar and may not minimized, maximized, or deleted.” The iPhone’s input area HAS a task bar and MAY be minimized or deleted. This patent describes input that becomes an “integral component” of the interface, whereas the iPhone’s interface is purely bolt-on.
There’s also a bit in the patent which describes the method of construction, and it stipulates the PROGRAMMING languages used to create the interface. Neither of the two mentioned—VB and C++—are used by Apple (they use an ugly little hodge podge called Objective C).
I say if you’re going to sue over patents, sue over vague patents—not ones that are inapplicable.
Posted by dasmb on August 8, 2007 at 9:02 AM (PDT)