News
Apple targeted by new data vending patent suit
By Jesse Hollington
Social Media & Software Editor, iLoungeGoogle+
Published: Thursday, March 29, 2012
News Categories: Apple
South African inventor Benjamin Grobler has filed a pair of lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that Apple has infringed on a “data vending system” patent issued to him in 2004. The lawsuits claim infringements on U.S. Patent 6,799,084 by operating data vending systems such as iTunes, and that the companies are further inducing their customers’ infringement. Among other things, the patent in question describes a system that stores data such as digitized music, video and/or computer programs, the dispensing of data to a uniquely identifiable data carrier, and the maintaining of owner and/or possessor records for digital content. The suit against Apple is asking for a declaration of infringement, as well as damages to be decided at the trial. [via Computerworld]
Related Stories
- Judge: US can show Apple e-book pricing conspiracy
- Report: iOS 7 ‘black, white, and flat all over’
- Apple WWDC Keynote set for June 10
- Apple patent application details interactive AirPlay, TV
- Report: iWatch pushed to late 2014?
- New Apple online store design alters focus, hides deals
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly coming Monday, giveaway update
- Apple drops refurbished fourth-gen iPad, mini prices
- Judge: US can show Apple e-book pricing conspiracy
- AT&T’s GoPhone to add LTE/HSPA+ support for iPhone
- Report: iOS 7 ‘black, white, and flat all over’
- Apple WWDC Keynote set for June 10
- Apps: Foursquare 6.2, Hyper Breaker Turbo, Pandora 4.3 + Shazam 6.0
- Apple patent application details interactive AirPlay, TV
- Report: iWatch pushed to late 2014?
- Griffin releases iPhone 5 Survivor + Catalyst Waterproof Case
Recent Reviews
- Lynktec TruGlide Pro Precision Stylus
- C4 Electronics Dolry HiFi Stone 30-Pin AirPlay Adapter
- Boombotix Boombot Rex Bluetooth Wireless Speaker
- Nuu Splash Portable Waterproof Bluetooth Wireless Speaker
- Scosche boomBottle Weatherproof Sport Wireless Speaker
- HMDX Jam Plus Bluetooth Wireless Speaker
- Fitbit Flex Wireless Activity & Sleep Wristband
- Cambridge Audio Minx Air 100 + 200 Bluetooth + AirPlay Wireless Speakers
- Mophie Juice Pack Plus for iPhone 5
- Ultimate Ears UE Boom
Recent Articles
- Costs associated with using FaceTime
- iMessages showing as Delivered when iPhone is out of coverage
- Inability to use Find My Friends without a passcode
- Calendar info disappears after iCloud restore
- Remove old iCloud backup after restoring to a new iPhone
- Setting up a ringtone in iTunes
- Using a Wi-Fi hard drive with an iPad
- Backing up and restoring an iPod classic
- Can’t restore iPod touch without passcode
- Retaining older versions of Apps during an iOS Restore


1
Patent 6,799,084 is, once again, reason 6,799,084 why the whole system needs chucked in the ocean and rebooted.
2004? People had been buying all manner of digital goods with exactly those “infringing” features for nearly a decade at that point. Heck, by the (non) logic being employed, that patent arguably covered AOL, Compuserve, and any number of previously existing services that had owner accounts and sold digital goods.
What is, once again, obvious reading over the patent is there isn’t a single specific, ready to implement feature in the patent at all. It’s pure concept, seemingly written by someone largely unfamiliar with any of the technology architecture to begin with.
Regardless, the real flaw of this patent troll’s actions is they didn’t see fit to vague it up even more since they clearly identify the system operating via the concept of a vending booth that dispenses to an “iPod” like device directly. Since the internet had been widespread since the mid 90s and personal computers since the mid 80s, the complete lack of mention of such services and personal hubs for dispensing shows how silly this particular lawsuit is amid a sea of patent suit silliness.
Posted by Code Monkey in Midstate New York on March 30, 2012 at 5:12 AM (PST)