News
Apple’s print apology ad to Samsung appears
By Phil Dzikiy
News Editor, iLoungeGoogle+
Published: Friday, November 2, 2012
News Categories: Apple
Apple’s first court-ordered print advertisement from its appeal loss to Samsung has appeared, and it certainly doesn’t resemble a typical Apple ad. Gizmodo UK posted a copy of the extremely plain and arguably difficult to read ad, which appeared on page five of The Guardian today. The ad dryly states that Samsung’s Galaxy tablet computers do not infringe on Apple’s “Community registered design No. 0000181607-0001” — the iPad is not mentioned by name.
This is in sharp contrast to the snarky notice of legal judgment Apple posted online. That notice has been pulled from Apple’s U.K. site, by court order, and it should be replaced shortly.
Updated Nov. 5: Apple published the same advertisement on its U.K. website. The link notes that the previously published notice “...was inaccurate and did not comply with the order of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.”
Related Stories
- Report: iRadio might miss WWDC debut
- Fair Labor Assoc.: Foxconn, Apple still exceed work hours
- Cook talks Apple’s taxes ahead of Senate testimony
- Apple releases iTunes 11.0.3 with new Mini Player
- Apple patent filing uses multiple devices to light a scene
- App Store hits 50 billion downloads
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly arriving Monday, giveaway reminder
- Report: BBM iOS app won’t support iPad at launch
- Report: iRadio might miss WWDC debut
- Fair Labor Assoc.: Foxconn, Apple still exceed work hours
- CW to bring content to Apple TV
- Moshi debuts aluminum USB Cable with Lightning Connector
- Cook talks Apple’s taxes ahead of Senate testimony
- iLuv intros Aud 5 Lightning speaker dock for iPhone 5
- Apps: Can Knockdown 3, eBay 3.0/2.3, Jungle Book + Sonic the Hedgehog 2.0
- Apple releases iTunes 11.0.3 with new Mini Player
Recent Reviews
- BlueFlame 2M Charge and Sync Cable with Lightning Connector
- HMDX Jam Party Bluetooth Wireless Stereo Speaker
- Logitech Harmony Ultimate Universal Remote Control
- MyCharge Freedom 2000 Battery Case for iPhone 5
- Nike Nike+ FuelBand
- OCDesk OCDock for iPhone 5
- Bluelounge MiniDock (With Lightning Connector)
- Mophie Juice Pack Powerstation Pro
- PhoneSuit Flex Pocket Charger
- Olloclip Quick-Flip Case + Pro-Photo Adapter for iPhone 5
Recent Articles
- Calendar info disappears after iCloud restore
- Remove old iCloud backup after restoring to a new iPhone
- Setting up a ringtone in iTunes
- Using a Wi-Fi hard drive with an iPad
- Backing up and restoring an iPod classic
- Can’t restore iPod touch without passcode
- Retaining older versions of Apps during an iOS Restore
- Can’t eject iPod nano without closing Firefox
- Can’t change iTunes Apple ID to iCloud e-mail address
- Effect of erasing an iPhone on the Find My iPhone feature
1
Apple is great at many things. Apologies isn’t one of them. I would expect the UK court to make them try again.
Posted by SomethingBorrowed on November 2, 2012 at 9:42 AM (PST)
2
Apple are trying to delay the removal of their original sarky “apology” by claiming it will take two weeks to replace the current page on their website! Now we all know that Apple is very quick to change webpages when they want - this is a blatant delaying tactic by Apple and one the judge is not going to fall for. They have 48 hours which in my opinion is 32 hours too long!
Posted by Bob Levens in UK on November 2, 2012 at 9:56 AM (PST)
3
“We need two weeks to tweak our website, say Apple.
It may be at the forefront of technology, but Apple told a court yesterday it would take two weeks to change a notice on it’s website.
Reacting with astonishment, judges questioned why the technology giant was not able to react a little more swiftly.
One judge suggested that Tim Cook, Apple’s chief executive, ought to make a statement setting out the “technical difficulty” facing the American firm.
They were sitting in the Court Of Appeal in London, hearing details of a patent dispute between Apple and Samsung.
Apple had been instructed by judges to publish a statement acknowledging that it had lost an earlier legal fight with Samsung.
The two firms returned to court after Samsung complained that the notice Apple posted did not comply with the court order and it should be altered.
A lawyer representing Apple said the firm could take a notice off it’s website in 24 hours but asked for 14 days to post a replacement.
Lord Justice Longmore told Michael Beloff QC: “We are just amazed that you cannot put the right notice up at the same time as you take the other one down.”
And Sir Robin Jacob added: “I would like to see the head of Apple make an affidavit about why that is such a technical difficulty for the Apple company.”
He told Mr Beloff: “I don’t believe the instructions you have been given. This is Apple that cannot put something on their own website?”
They said Apple should post the notice within 48 hours.”
Shane Richmond - Daily Telegraph
Posted by Bob Levens in UK on November 2, 2012 at 11:24 AM (PST)