News
AT&T: iPhone restock fee, SIM, no insurance details
By Jeremy Horwitz
Editor-in-Chief, iLoungeGoogle+
Published: Wednesday, June 27, 2007
News Categories: iPhone
In a newly added iPhone frequently asked questions (FAQ) page of its site, AT&T today published a number of contract terms important to prospective iPhone buyers. Notably, the FAQ discloses both a 10% open box restock fee for returned iPhones and a limited 14-day return policy, shorter than the 30-day return policies often offered for mobile phones. There is no restocking fee for unopened iPhones. AT&T also notes that iPhone ships with a SIM card pre-installed in its removable tray, and that the phone “must be activated before it can be used” regardless of whether you already have an AT&T SIM card.
Most interesting is the fact that iPhone is not covered by AT&T’s optional wireless phone insurance program, which offers replacements for damaged or defective AT&T phones during the life of your service agreement. “iPhone is ineligible for the Wireless Phone Insurance program offered to AT&T customers,” says the FAQ. “iPhone is covered by the Apple Warranty. If you have Wireless Phone Insurance from AT&T, it will be removed from your line of service.” Additional questions for current AT&T customers are also answered in the FAQ.
Related Stories
- Apps: Can Knockdown 3, eBay 3.0/2.3, Jungle Book + Sonic the Hedgehog 2.0
- Apple patent filing uses multiple devices to light a scene
- Google: iOS Hangouts, new Maps, Music All Access + More
- In-flight e-device guidelines still up in the air
- Apple sued over iPhone 4 power button failures
- Watch ABC app streams live TV programming
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly arriving Monday, giveaway reminder
- Report: BBM iOS app won’t support iPad at launch
- Report: iRadio might miss WWDC debut
- Fair Labor Assoc.: Foxconn, Apple still exceed work hours
- CW to bring content to Apple TV
- Moshi debuts aluminum USB Cable with Lightning Connector
- Cook talks Apple’s taxes ahead of Senate testimony
- iLuv intros Aud 5 Lightning speaker dock for iPhone 5
- Apps: Can Knockdown 3, eBay 3.0/2.3, Jungle Book + Sonic the Hedgehog 2.0
- Apple releases iTunes 11.0.3 with new Mini Player
Recent Reviews
- BlueFlame 2M Charge and Sync Cable with Lightning Connector
- HMDX Jam Party Bluetooth Wireless Stereo Speaker
- Logitech Harmony Ultimate Universal Remote Control
- MyCharge Freedom 2000 Battery Case for iPhone 5
- Nike Nike+ FuelBand
- OCDesk OCDock for iPhone 5
- Bluelounge MiniDock (With Lightning Connector)
- Mophie Juice Pack Powerstation Pro
- PhoneSuit Flex Pocket Charger
- Olloclip Quick-Flip Case + Pro-Photo Adapter for iPhone 5
Recent Articles
- Calendar info disappears after iCloud restore
- Remove old iCloud backup after restoring to a new iPhone
- Setting up a ringtone in iTunes
- Using a Wi-Fi hard drive with an iPad
- Backing up and restoring an iPod classic
- Can’t restore iPod touch without passcode
- Retaining older versions of Apps during an iOS Restore
- Can’t eject iPod nano without closing Firefox
- Can’t change iTunes Apple ID to iCloud e-mail address
- Effect of erasing an iPhone on the Find My iPhone feature
1
Seems unfair to charge a re-stocking fee if you bring it home and don’t get good reception?
Posted by Rob John on June 27, 2007 at 9:08 AM (PST)
2
What about California Law - I thought that we were guaranteed a 30 day return regardless of carrier policy.
Any ideas?
Posted by Andy on June 27, 2007 at 11:40 AM (PST)
3
I think California law would trump policies of a company. The company operates under the laws of the respective jurisdictions.
Posted by Zar on June 27, 2007 at 12:53 PM (PST)
4
Yes, California law requires a 30-day return period, and I believe might even prohibit the restocking fee…We’ll see.
Posted by AJ on June 27, 2007 at 6:55 PM (PST)
5
The IPhone is a great device with the exception of its functionality as a Phone, which is my primary use. Throughout the past week the phone has failed to deliver acceptable service. Examples are having 5 bars, never moving, placing a call and having the call fail and the phone then displaying “No Service.” I found this experience throughout a three city area. I even had this experience while sitting with two other friends who have AT&T service but different phones. When my phone dropped out and said “No Service,” they both still had 5 bars and a functioning phone. The phone siimply did not perform in a manner that is consistent with the implied Warranty of a phone using your the AT&T service and I the conflicts in warranty are bound to cause problems.
Posted by George on July 15, 2007 at 10:11 AM (PST)
6
I bought the IPHONE about 10 days ago. I work as a Flight Attendant and enjoyed not having to carry 2 devices around.
But, the IPHONE’s reception has been nothing but lacking and
not living to ATT’s 5 bar service everywhere promised.
I am returning the Iphone after 10 days and expect to be charge the 10% re-stocking fee. Another very important reason why I am returning the Iphone has been the lack of insurance protection.
I hope that ATT and APPLE re-think the lack of insurance protection issue. For the road warrior, insurance coverage is essential.
Posted by JO on August 20, 2008 at 3:28 PM (PST)