News
AT&T: iPhone restock fee, SIM, no insurance details
By Jeremy Horwitz
Editor-in-Chief, iLounge
Published: Wednesday, June 27, 2007
News Category: iPhone
In a newly added iPhone frequently asked questions (FAQ) page of its site, AT&T today published a number of contract terms important to prospective iPhone buyers. Notably, the FAQ discloses both a 10% open box restock fee for returned iPhones and a limited 14-day return policy, shorter than the 30-day return policies often offered for mobile phones. There is no restocking fee for unopened iPhones. AT&T also notes that iPhone ships with a SIM card pre-installed in its removable tray, and that the phone “must be activated before it can be used” regardless of whether you already have an AT&T SIM card.
Most interesting is the fact that iPhone is not covered by AT&T’s optional wireless phone insurance program, which offers replacements for damaged or defective AT&T phones during the life of your service agreement. “iPhone is ineligible for the Wireless Phone Insurance program offered to AT&T customers,” says the FAQ. “iPhone is covered by the Apple Warranty. If you have Wireless Phone Insurance from AT&T, it will be removed from your line of service.” Additional questions for current AT&T customers are also answered in the FAQ.
Related Stories
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Tweetbot adds Nearby tweets, Keyword mute filters + more
- Facebook releases Facebook Camera
- Bump adds photo to computer transfers
- Sharp to supply tech for Foxconn iPhone display plant
- Infinity Blade II: Vault of Tears update released
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Pulp adds iCloud sync, new Home Page
- WordPress for iOS adds Push Notifications
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Apple device poll ends, computing poll begins
- Fruit Ninja adds new features and power-ups
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Third-gen iPad to launch in Guam, Philippines May 29
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
- Panic releases Diet Coda
- Booq rolls out new Folio for iPad
Recent Reviews
- Pelican i1075 Hardback Case for iPad
- Skinit Skins for iPad (3rd-Generation)
- Spigen SGP Steinheil Ultra Optics Screen Protector for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- ZeroChroma VarioProtect for iPhone 4/4S
- BodyGuardz UltraTough Clear Skins for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Wrapsol Original + Ultra Hybrid Protective Film for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- iBattz Mojo Removable Power Card Wallet
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Power View Pro S 2.1A Dual Charging Dock
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Universal Power View
- Sena Cases Florence Portfolio for iPad (3rd-Gen)
Recent Articles
- Removing music from iTunes after copying to iPod
- iOS Gems: Farm 123, Facebook Camera, Scribblenauts, Shoot the Zombirds + Virtua Tennis Challenge
- iTunes TV show size totals don’t match actual disk storage
- Consolidating Multiple iTunes Libraries
- Converting Purchased Videos to 1080p HD
- Find My Friends always reports home location
- Creating an iTunes Match library from an external hard drive
- Benefits of keeping apps in iTunes when using iCloud
- Recovering iTunes from an External Hard Drive
- Normalizing volume levels for Voice Memos
1
Seems unfair to charge a re-stocking fee if you bring it home and don’t get good reception?
Posted by Rob John on June 27, 2007 at 10:08 AM (PDT)
2
What about California Law - I thought that we were guaranteed a 30 day return regardless of carrier policy.
Any ideas?
Posted by Andy on June 27, 2007 at 12:40 PM (PDT)
3
I think California law would trump policies of a company. The company operates under the laws of the respective jurisdictions.
Posted by Zar on June 27, 2007 at 1:53 PM (PDT)
4
Yes, California law requires a 30-day return period, and I believe might even prohibit the restocking fee…We’ll see.
Posted by AJ on June 27, 2007 at 7:55 PM (PDT)
5
The IPhone is a great device with the exception of its functionality as a Phone, which is my primary use. Throughout the past week the phone has failed to deliver acceptable service. Examples are having 5 bars, never moving, placing a call and having the call fail and the phone then displaying “No Service.” I found this experience throughout a three city area. I even had this experience while sitting with two other friends who have AT&T service but different phones. When my phone dropped out and said “No Service,” they both still had 5 bars and a functioning phone. The phone siimply did not perform in a manner that is consistent with the implied Warranty of a phone using your the AT&T service and I the conflicts in warranty are bound to cause problems.
Posted by George on July 15, 2007 at 11:11 AM (PDT)
6
I bought the IPHONE about 10 days ago. I work as a Flight Attendant and enjoyed not having to carry 2 devices around.
But, the IPHONE’s reception has been nothing but lacking and
not living to ATT’s 5 bar service everywhere promised.
I am returning the Iphone after 10 days and expect to be charge the 10% re-stocking fee. Another very important reason why I am returning the Iphone has been the lack of insurance protection.
I hope that ATT and APPLE re-think the lack of insurance protection issue. For the road warrior, insurance coverage is essential.
Posted by JO on August 20, 2008 at 4:28 PM (PDT)