News
FDA: iPods unlikely to interfere with pacemakers
Contrary to a study presented last May, a new U.S. Food and Drug Administration study shows that iPods, and other portable media players, are unlikely to cause cardiac implantable pacemakers to malfunction. FDA researcher Howard Bassen and colleagues tested a variety of iPods, and found they did not produce enough of an electromagnetic field to interfere with installed pacemakers. The researchers used a saline-filled bag to simulate the human body, a coil sensor to pick up electromagnetic emissions, and tested four different iPod models: both a fourth- and fifth-generation iPod, an iPod nano, and an iPod shuffle. “We measured magnetic field emissions with a 3-coil sensor placed within 1 cm (half an inch) of the surface of the player. Highly localized fields were observed (only existing in a one square cm area),” the researchers wrote in a report published in the journal BioMedical Engineering OnLine. “Based on the observations of our in-vitro study we conclude that no interference effects can occur in pacemakers exposed to the iPods we tested.”
Next: O2 offers 'bolt ons' for iPhone plans
Previous: Tunewear intros Tuneshell cases for iPod touch, classic, nano 3G
Shop in the loungeStore for iPod + iPhone Accessories.
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Mix: Tap Tap Dance, FluidTunes, Flickr, OSU
- Tag Games previews Car Jack Streets for iPhone, iPod touch
- Logic3 unveils i-Station25 sound system for iPod, iPhone
- Mix: iPhone 3G ads, Gartner, iFund, DownloadShopper
- Scosche rolls out reviveLITE charger/nightlight for iPod, iPhone
- iLoungers create iPhone coffee table
- Speck debuts QwickDraw holster for iPhone, iPhone 3G
- Mix: Pandora, Zagat, Smiles, DeskClock
- Amazon Mobile iPhone app lets users search via photo
- Photo of the Week: iPod touch in Rome
Recent Reviews
- Apple iPod classic (120GB)
- Apple iPod touch Second-Generation (8GB/16GB/32GB)
- Apple iPod nano Fourth-Generation (4GB/8GB/16GB)
- Apple iPhone 3G (8GB/16GB)
- Numark TTi USB Turntable with Universal Dock
- Jensen JiMS-525i Docking Digital HD Radio System for iPod and iPhone
- Gear4 DUO Versatile Speaker System for iPod
- Boston Acoustics Horizon Duo-i
- myvu Crystal 701 iPod Edition
- JBL On Stage 200ID

1
That’s all well and good, but why did they not test any actual pacemakers in-vitro? If that one centimeter square magnetic field was moved through a pacemaker, would any effects be observed? It just seems like kind of an obvious test…
Posted by jarofchris on February 1, 2008 at 7:59 PM (PDT)
2
For jarofchris:
It may be a little problem called “ethics.” Since two previous experiments had indicated possible problems, they had to be careful.
Posted by gslusher on February 1, 2008 at 11:12 PM (PDT)
3
For gslusher:
There is also a little problem called “reading carelessly”. I specifically said why not test pacemakers “in vitro”, which effectively means in the lab. This is to be contrasted with “in vivo”, which means in the body. My point was that rather than setting up an artificial test, why not test an actual pacemaker in the lab (NOT connected to an actual body, but connected to equipment that measured its output). Honestly, “ethics?”
Posted by jarofchris on February 4, 2008 at 7:03 PM (PDT)