News
iPhone interest is high if price is right
Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster believes that Apple’s long-rumored iPhone needs to be priced around $300 to gain significant traction. In his latest research report, Munster estimates the average price of music enabled phones currently available in the U.S. to be $317, and notes that now is the time for Apple to release such a product. The analyst also offers survey data from Apple Expo in Paris, which finds that 74% of European Apple customers would be highly likely to buy an iPhone that holds 1,000 songs. “Price is clearly a consideration, however, and many customers indicated that they feel that an iPhone has the same value as Apple’s high capacity iPods,” Munster said. Specifically, the consumers said, on average, they would pay $285 for such a product. Munster expects Apple will announce an iPhone sometime in the next 3-6 months.
Related Stories
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
- Apple removes Airfoil Speakers Touch from the App Store
- Apple claims e-book lawsuit is ‘fundamentally flawed’
- Apple SVP Jonathan Ive receives knighthood
- Apple, Samsung CEOs meet for talks
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Pulp adds iCloud sync, new Home Page
- WordPress for iOS adds Push Notifications
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Apple device poll ends, computing poll begins
- Fruit Ninja adds new features and power-ups
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Third-gen iPad to launch in Guam, Philippines May 29
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
- Panic releases Diet Coda
- Booq rolls out new Folio for iPad
Recent Reviews
- Pelican i1075 Hardback Case for iPad
- Skinit Skins for iPad (3rd-Generation)
- Spigen SGP Steinheil Ultra Optics Screen Protector for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- ZeroChroma VarioProtect for iPhone 4/4S
- BodyGuardz UltraTough Clear Skins for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Wrapsol Original + Ultra Hybrid Protective Film for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- iBattz Mojo Removable Power Card Wallet
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Power View Pro S 2.1A Dual Charging Dock
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Universal Power View
- Sena Cases Florence Portfolio for iPad (3rd-Gen)
Recent Articles
- Removing music from iTunes after copying to iPod
- iOS Gems: Farm 123, Facebook Camera, Scribblenauts, Shoot the Zombirds + Virtua Tennis Challenge
- iTunes TV show size totals don’t match actual disk storage
- Consolidating Multiple iTunes Libraries
- Converting Purchased Videos to 1080p HD
- Find My Friends always reports home location
- Creating an iTunes Match library from an external hard drive
- Benefits of keeping apps in iTunes when using iCloud
- Recovering iTunes from an External Hard Drive
- Normalizing volume levels for Voice Memos
1
(Keep in mind that I am, and have been, an avid consumer of Apple products. A self-described “Mac addict” on occasion. I only own one iPod, though—the iPod Shuffle.)
It is highly likely that most mobile phone DAPs will play more audio formats than any phone that Apple brings to market. Even Microsoft’s Zune (not a phone, I know—but with Wifi included, there’s always the possibility of Internet phone) will include the ability to play AAC audio. Unless Apple includes the ability to play more audio formats, I think the iPhone won’t sell as well as their iPod.
Posted by Harold J. Johnson on September 22, 2006 at 9:30 AM (PDT)
2
Like all mobile phones the price of admission is too high (artificially high)—unless you are willing to sign an annually based contract (the hook, whereby you are charged what the phone is really worth, but obligated for a certain term). Reoccurring monthly fees and services…ahhhh the good capitalism life.
iPhone if you phone, but only if the iPhone is reasonably priced with both plan and package.
Posted by FahrenheiPod 451 on September 22, 2006 at 12:17 PM (PDT)
3
Bleee. I have little need for a music phone, although it would be nice if it had good iTunes integration and the matching interface.
What we want to see from Apple is a cellphone that WORKS, and WORKS WELL. Stable. Highly responsive interface. No crashes. Like they used to make phones in the 90s, if you remember phones that just worked. It has to integrate perfectly with Mac OS X. I want to be able to use it as a remote for the Mac at home, or maybe even on the go. All in a sturdy yet attractive scratchproof case. Plus 1 or 2 nifty features only Apple could come up with.
I would rather pay more and get a good product with functional features than some bland thingy “with iTunes”.
Posted by Bad Beaver on September 23, 2006 at 4:06 AM (PDT)
4
I would like to have a phone that does LESS.
Every non-phone capability on every phone out there is done half-assed.
Games, camera, music, video, web, whatever. It’s all a joke. And now Apple can come along and change mobile phone history? Well, that would be really good if they could…
Posted by joseph on September 24, 2006 at 2:56 PM (PDT)