News
iSuppli: Apple TV 2G materials cost under $64?
By Charles Starrett
Senior Editor, iLounge
Published: Tuesday, October 5, 2010
News Category: Apple TV
According to market research firm iSuppli, the second-generation Apple TV may have a materials cost of less than $64. Citing iSuppli’s teardown of the device, Bloomberg BusinessWeek reports that the Apple TV’s Samsung-made A4 processor is its most expensive part at $16.55, followed by the Toshiba 8GB flash memory chip, which is estimated to cost $14. The Broadcom-sourced Wi-Fi and Bluetooth chip costs $7.65, according to iSuppli’s estimate, and a Texas Instruments $0.93 microcontroller chip also contributes to the overall cost. Overall, iSuppli found that the use of components similar to those found in the company’s other iOS devices helped to bring the materials cost down to a lower percentage of the retail price than was seen in the first-generation model. “As soon as we saw the first A4 chip in the iPad, it was pretty clear to us that Apple’s plan was to use it across several devices,” said Andrew Rassweiler, the iSuppli analyst who performed the teardown. “It makes sense to control costs across the supply chain.”
Related Stories
- ESPN in talks with Apple to bring content to Apple TV
- Foxconn making preparations for Apple HDTV
- Apple releases Apple TV Software Update 5.0.1
- Kanex ATV Pro solves Apple TV to VGA dilemma
- Third-gen Apple TV found to have dual-core A5
- Apple supplier Hon Hai takes large stake in Sharp
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Pulp adds iCloud sync, new Home Page
- WordPress for iOS adds Push Notifications
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Apple device poll ends, computing poll begins
- Fruit Ninja adds new features and power-ups
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Third-gen iPad to launch in Guam, Philippines May 29
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
- Panic releases Diet Coda
- Booq rolls out new Folio for iPad
Recent Reviews
- Pelican i1075 Hardback Case for iPad
- Skinit Skins for iPad (3rd-Generation)
- Spigen SGP Steinheil Ultra Optics Screen Protector for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- ZeroChroma VarioProtect for iPhone 4/4S
- BodyGuardz UltraTough Clear Skins for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Wrapsol Original + Ultra Hybrid Protective Film for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- iBattz Mojo Removable Power Card Wallet
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Power View Pro S 2.1A Dual Charging Dock
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Universal Power View
- Sena Cases Florence Portfolio for iPad (3rd-Gen)
Recent Articles
- Removing music from iTunes after copying to iPod
- iOS Gems: Farm 123, Facebook Camera, Scribblenauts, Shoot the Zombirds + Virtua Tennis Challenge
- iTunes TV show size totals don’t match actual disk storage
- Consolidating Multiple iTunes Libraries
- Converting Purchased Videos to 1080p HD
- Find My Friends always reports home location
- Creating an iTunes Match library from an external hard drive
- Benefits of keeping apps in iTunes when using iCloud
- Recovering iTunes from an External Hard Drive
- Normalizing volume levels for Voice Memos
1
I’m shocked that the material cost alone is nearly 2/3 of the retail price. When you factor in labor and other expenses, ATV is hardly a profitable product for Apple.
Either this truly is a “hobby” product for them, or perhaps they expect to generate a lot more revenue through rentals, or maybe its as simple as Apple wanting to help foster the trend towards on-demand video, with more developments yet to come if this trend takes off.
Posted by rockmyplimsoul on October 5, 2010 at 9:28 AM (PDT)
2
@rockmyplimsoul:
I figure the very non-Apple profit margin is because this is a do or die change for the “hobby”. If Apple can’t get the Apple TV into enough hands they lose their leverage with the studios that are fighting them. In the chicken and egg catch-22, without compelling content deals, they’ve got hard time convincing people to put an ATV2 in their homes.
This isn’t a “must have” device at any price, at least not now. On the other hand, with 802.11n wi-fi capability and no out and out on device storage, it’s pretty much good for the foreseeable future at doing what it does. So although it may not make much profit directly now, it is still profitable and it will do nothing but get cheaper over time, particularly if they can start to sell enough of them.
Heck, at $99, I’m sorely tempted to get one just to have a more convenient way of feeing music to speakers throughout my house. Instead of running wires, or building a PC just for music (which is then taking up space next to the stereo), or having to plug an iPod into everything, I just stick an AppleTV there and use my touch as the remote.
At any other price point Apple would actually have to be convincing us there was a real use for this thing.
Posted by Code Monkey in Midstate New York on October 5, 2010 at 1:59 PM (PDT)
3
“I’m sorely tempted to get one just to have a more convenient way of feeing music to speakers throughout my house…”
The downside to that approach is the Apple TV needs a TV connected to actually configure it, although I suppose once you’ve done that you can simply use it as an AirPlay device, and it only supports optical audio and HDMI outputs. The Airport Express would be a more practical option for simply streaming audio throughout the house since it provides analog output and can be configured remotely.
Also, oddly the Airport Express is cheaper than the Apple TV up here in Canada—it sells for the same $99 price as in the U.S., while the Apple TV is priced at $119.
Posted by Jesse Hollington in Toronto on October 6, 2010 at 9:43 AM (PDT)