News
iSuppli nano teardown reveals wide margins for Apple
By Charles Starrett
Senior Editor, iLounge
Published: Wednesday, September 19, 2007
News Category: iPod nano
Market analysis group iSuppli has completed its teardown of the new iPod nano (with video), and estimates the Bill of Materials cost of the 4GB model to be $58.85, giving it the lowest BOM cost of any member of the nano line analyzed by iSuppli. The firm estimates the 8GB model’s BOM cost to be $82.85. While these estimates do not include other costs such as manufacturing, software, intellectual property, accessories, packaging, R&D, or advertising, the company claims the ratio between the 4GB nano’s BOM cost and its retail price of $149 is quite high, even for Apple. Part of this reduction in costs may be attributed to changes in component suppliers. “The changes in components have resulted in significant cost reductions in the nano design, allowing Apple to offer a product that is less expensive to build and that has enhanced features compared to its predecessor,” said Andrew Rassweiler, senior analyst and teardown services manager for iSuppli.
Among these new component suppliers, Micron, Dialog and Intersil — along with the return of Synaptics — the “big winner,” according to iSuppli, was U.S. semicondutor supplier Micron. ISuppli claims this is the first time they have identified a Micron part in an iPod; in the nano torn down by iSuppli, Micron was the manufacturer of the NAND flash memory that serves as the media player’s storage, an estimated $24 part in the 4GB model and $48 in the 8GB. iSuppli notes that while this is a major win for Micron, Apple will likely continue to use Samsung, the world’s largest producer of NAND-type flash, as suppliers of NAND memory. Samsung supplied the combined core video processing chip in the system, which is estimated to cost $8.60.
Shop in the loungeStore for iPod + iPhone Accessories.
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Report: iPod, iPhone failures due to common part issues
- Sign up for our iPodweek newsletter, coming later today
- Memorex to launch SingStand mic, miniMove speaker for iPod
- Mix: Spore Apology, MTS Russia, Another 3G lawsuit
- Tunewear rolls out line of iPhone 3G cases
- EA: Spore for iPhone coming soon, other titles revealed
- Master Lock iCage offers iPod theft protection
- Mix: Pull My Finger, NTT DoCoMo, Turkcell, Jewel Quest II
- Etón debuts Porsche Design P’9121 Stereo System for iPod
- Sharp intros mini audio system with iPod dock
Recent Reviews
- Apple iPhone 3G (8GB/16GB)
- Numark TTi USB Turntable with Universal Dock
- Jensen JiMS-525i Docking Digital HD Radio System for iPod and iPhone
- Gear4 DUO Versatile Speaker System for iPod
- Boston Acoustics Horizon Duo-i
- myvu Crystal 701 iPod Edition
- JBL On Stage 200ID
- Griffin ClearBoost for iPhone
- Sleek Audio SA6 In-Ear Earphones with Tunable VQ Technology
- Vestalife Ladybug & Element Skateboards Limited Edition Ladybug

1
The ratio of MSRP to BOM cost (called cost of good sold [CGS]) in most consumer goods is typically 3:1 to 4:1. The design goal is almost always 4:1.
Perhaps consumer electronics are different, but in the fitness equipment industry and water filtration industry, where finished goods range from $600 to $8,000, such 4:1 margins are common and, in fact, necessary to drive marketing and R & D functions.
I am curious as to whether the breathless reporting of “high” Apple iPod margins over the past year are because consumer electronics margins are very different from other consumer goods, or because of a lack of familiarity of the reporters about typical manufacturing margins.
Posted by Bob Starr on September 19, 2007 at 12:06 PM (PDT)