News
iTMS discussed in ‘The Tyranny of Copyright?’
By Dennis Lloyd
Publisher, iLoungeGoogle+
Published: Tuesday, January 27, 2004
News Categories: iTunes
The iTunes Music Store is used as an example of the future of copyright policy in the United States in a New York Times Magazine article by Robert S. Boynton.
Related Stories
- WWDC 2013 Keynote: Live Updates + Insights Here
- Report: iRadio to rival Pandora, add ‘highly targeted’ ads
- Apple releases iTunes 11.0.4
- Apple releases iTunes 11.0.3 with new Mini Player
- Microsoft: Don’t expect iTunes app on Windows 8
- Apple launches ‘A Decade of iTunes’
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Apps: Gangstar Vegas, Man of Steel, Photo Cube WiFi 3.59 + Play-Doh Create ABCs
- Alleged iPhone 5S leaks show display, logic board
- Apple TV beta reveals iTunes Radio support
- Apple’s Cue reveals more iBooks launch details
- Apple releases Commitment to Customer Privacy statement
- iOS 7 shown on iPad through emulator
- Photo leak shows Logitech iOS controller
- iLounge Weekly coming Monday, June giveaway reminder
- Apple site reveals iOS 7 for iPad, alternate icons
- Apple’s Cue: Jobs needed convincing on iBooks
Recent Reviews
- PureGear PX260 + PX360 Extreme Protection System for iPhone 5
- Odoyo Power+Shell EX Rechargeable Battery Case for iPhone 5
- Soundfreaq Sound Step Lightning SFQ-02L
- LifeProof Frē for iPad mini
- iBattz Mojo Refuel Removable Battery Case + Mojo Refuel Armor Kit for iPhone 5
- Geneva Lab Geneva Sound System Model S Wireless
- Bracketron Twist & Charge
- CruxCase CruxSkunk Keyboard Case for iPad 2, iPad (3rd/4th-Gen)
- Sol Republic Master Tracks
- Beats Electronics Beats Executive
Recent Articles
- iOS 7: Settings, Including Accessibility + Wallpaper
- iOS 7: Weather, Stocks, Calendar + Reminders
- iOS 7: Phone, FaceTime, Messages + Contacts
- iOS 7: iTunes Store, App Store, Calculator + Mail
- iOS 7: Music, Videos, Photos + Camera
- iOS 7: Clock, Game Center, Newsstand + Safari
- iOS 7: Siri + Voice Control
- iOS 7: Activation Lock + Find My iPhone
- iOS 7: Control Center, Notification Center, Spotlight, Multitasking
- iOS 7: Maps, Passbook, Compass + Notes


1
I don’t believe this is true at all. One service like iTunes dosn’t really let you see the future of copyright.
If iTunes really did cause some radical change in our society, than it should have happened long time ago with other music stores. But it didn’t.
Implimenting this “system” will require the distributers more cash out than the profit it self.
Posted by Pod on January 27, 2004 at 9:19 PM (PST)
2
Hmm, $0.25 for a sentence? I think that is a bit of a stretch. Gotta love the publicity though. If iTunes could be branded, like kleenex, that would be great. Instead of saying I get my music from a download service you could just say, “I get it from iTunes”.
Posted by slider on January 28, 2004 at 2:33 AM (PST)
3
sure, this is a stretch, but you can feel the point. im glad that he wrote this because i think he got what he wanted: people to be cautious of future technology.
however, i don’t see the world of CD’s being completely full of copy protection, yet.
this will be interesting to watch
Posted by Fiddytree on January 28, 2004 at 3:11 AM (PST)
4
We’re already there! We’re all borrowing Windows XP right now, it can expire anytime and Microsoft can force us to buy its new OS.
Microsoft’s next OS (Longhorn) is chalked full of “Digital Rights Management”. It checks to see what files have been altered and what software has been verified at boot-up. Should any files be modified or added without authorization, Longhorn will not load. Do you see the problem this imposes?
Because the hackers in the future will always have a work around…the only people encountering these problems will be honest people who accidently ‘violated’ microsoft’s terms of use.
Imagine if Cingular or Verizon were able to monitor your phone conversations just because you use their service. If you muttered a word they object to your phone could be rendered useless and you’d have to explain yourself to them…sounds good to Microsoft and the hundreds of other corporations it pitches its DRM too.
Posted by Ryan on January 28, 2004 at 9:01 AM (PST)
5
sounds like aol :S
Posted by dave on January 28, 2004 at 4:45 PM (PST)