News
Microsoft co-founder relaunches suit against Apple, others
By Charles Starrett
Senior Editor, iLounge
Published: Wednesday, December 29, 2010
News Category: Apple, iTunes
Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen’s company Interval Research Corp. has filed an expanded version of its lawsuit against Apple, Google, AOL, eBay, Facebook, Netflix, Office Depot, OfficeMax, Staples, Yahoo, and Google’s YouTube subsidiary, providing more details in its attempt to prove patent infringement. Originally filed in August, the suit was dismissed by a federal judge in Seattle earlier this month for being too vague. The patents in question cover automatic suggestions for shopping sites, automatic location of related stories on a news site, and the presentation of information such as ads, stock quotes, news updates, or videos on a computer screen, in the periphery of the user’s main activity. The amended complaint includes more details of how the companies supposedly infringed, along with 40 exhibits, which according to the Seattle Times are largely screenshots of websites and services with specific areas highlighted. The exhibit submitted to illustrate Apple’s violations includes the top portion of an iTunes Store album listing, including the track listing and preview buttons, the buy button, a top songs and albums section for the artist, and recommendations based on what listeners of that album have purchased.
Related Stories
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
- Apple removes Airfoil Speakers Touch from the App Store
- Apple claims e-book lawsuit is ‘fundamentally flawed’
- Apple SVP Jonathan Ive receives knighthood
- Apple, Samsung CEOs meet for talks
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Pulp adds iCloud sync, new Home Page
- WordPress for iOS adds Push Notifications
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Apple device poll ends, computing poll begins
- Fruit Ninja adds new features and power-ups
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Third-gen iPad to launch in Guam, Philippines May 29
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
- Panic releases Diet Coda
- Booq rolls out new Folio for iPad
Recent Reviews
- Pelican i1075 Hardback Case for iPad
- Skinit Skins for iPad (3rd-Generation)
- Spigen SGP Steinheil Ultra Optics Screen Protector for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- ZeroChroma VarioProtect for iPhone 4/4S
- BodyGuardz UltraTough Clear Skins for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Wrapsol Original + Ultra Hybrid Protective Film for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- iBattz Mojo Removable Power Card Wallet
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Power View Pro S 2.1A Dual Charging Dock
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Universal Power View
- Sena Cases Florence Portfolio for iPad (3rd-Gen)
Recent Articles
- Removing music from iTunes after copying to iPod
- iOS Gems: Farm 123, Facebook Camera, Scribblenauts, Shoot the Zombirds + Virtua Tennis Challenge
- iTunes TV show size totals don’t match actual disk storage
- Consolidating Multiple iTunes Libraries
- Converting Purchased Videos to 1080p HD
- Find My Friends always reports home location
- Creating an iTunes Match library from an external hard drive
- Benefits of keeping apps in iTunes when using iCloud
- Recovering iTunes from an External Hard Drive
- Normalizing volume levels for Voice Memos
1
IANAL, and I have no idea how valid this suit is in terms of existing patent law, but the very idea that one can patent the location of buttons, images, and text on a screen is just mind-blowingly stupid.
Posted by didymos! on December 29, 2010 at 11:56 AM (PDT)
2
Strange that Amazon’s not named. Are they payuing some sort of license fee to Internval Research Corp?
Posted by orgel in Falls Church, VA on December 29, 2010 at 12:57 PM (PDT)
3
@1: Yep, our patent laws have become increasingly outdated. Technology moves far too fast for existing patent laws. There is a point where saying, “Hey, wouldn’t it be amazing if there were some automated process that could look at what you were buying and automatically make intelligent suggestions about something else you would probably want to buy?” is actually a great and original idea, and then about two years later comes the time that having that idea is like, “Hey, wouldn’t it be amazing if houses had roofs on them?”.
Copyright and Patent laws were, more than anything, designed to promote ingenuity by allowing a reasonable period - based on the pace of technology hundreds of years ago - for the inventor to profit from their creation/idea and then, after that reasonable period, turn these creations and ideas over to the public domain. The reasonable period for positioning a buy button is what, six months?
Posted by Code Monkey in Midstate New York on December 29, 2010 at 8:43 PM (PDT)