News
More companies join opposition to ‘App Store’ trademark
By Charles Starrett
Senior Editor, iLounge
Published: Friday, May 13, 2011
News Category: Apple, Apps + Games
Microsoft and Nokia have joined the opposition to Apple’s “App Store” trademark claim in Europe. Macworld UK reports that both Sony Ericsson and HTC have joined the effort to block the trademark claim, which the companies claim is too generic, and should be available for any company to use for stores that sell applications. “Both terms lack distinctiveness and so the registrations should not have been granted,” said a Nokia spokeswoman. According to the report, the move to block Apple’s trademarks in Europe was started by Amazon last month; Microsoft is also trying to block Apple’s “App Store” trademark request in the U.S., while Apple has filed suit against Amazon in the U.S. over its use of the term.
Related Stories
- Pulp adds iCloud sync, new Home Page
- WordPress for iOS adds Push Notifications
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Fruit Ninja adds new features and power-ups
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Pulp adds iCloud sync, new Home Page
- WordPress for iOS adds Push Notifications
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Apple device poll ends, computing poll begins
- Fruit Ninja adds new features and power-ups
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Third-gen iPad to launch in Guam, Philippines May 29
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
- Panic releases Diet Coda
- Booq rolls out new Folio for iPad
Recent Reviews
- Pelican i1075 Hardback Case for iPad
- Skinit Skins for iPad (3rd-Generation)
- Spigen SGP Steinheil Ultra Optics Screen Protector for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- ZeroChroma VarioProtect for iPhone 4/4S
- BodyGuardz UltraTough Clear Skins for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Wrapsol Original + Ultra Hybrid Protective Film for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- iBattz Mojo Removable Power Card Wallet
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Power View Pro S 2.1A Dual Charging Dock
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Universal Power View
- Sena Cases Florence Portfolio for iPad (3rd-Gen)
Recent Articles
- Removing music from iTunes after copying to iPod
- iOS Gems: Farm 123, Facebook Camera, Scribblenauts, Shoot the Zombirds + Virtua Tennis Challenge
- iTunes TV show size totals don’t match actual disk storage
- Consolidating Multiple iTunes Libraries
- Converting Purchased Videos to 1080p HD
- Find My Friends always reports home location
- Creating an iTunes Match library from an external hard drive
- Benefits of keeping apps in iTunes when using iCloud
- Recovering iTunes from an External Hard Drive
- Normalizing volume levels for Voice Memos
1
Good for Microsoft.
I just hope they don’t have an issue with Apple when they use “To the cloud” in their new services commercials…
</sarcasm>
What nerve.
Posted by sb on May 14, 2011 at 12:37 PM (PDT)
2
In related news, Apple is now suing Sony music for infringing on their copyrights, by selling music, and suing Miramax for distributing movies.
Posted by Jeff on May 15, 2011 at 6:57 AM (PDT)
3
Lack distinctiveness? Oh, you mean like the term Windows?
Posted by Apple Dog in Mexico City on May 15, 2011 at 7:52 PM (PDT)
4
“Windows” for an OS is 100% distinctive, the word is not synonymous with an operating system now, nor was it ever. Microsoft cannot go after Andersen Windows any more than Andersen Windows can go after them. Using it as an alleged example of the hypocrisy just makes you look like a douche.
“App” on the other hand, as I’ve pointed out repeatedly, was in us since the 1980s as a shortened form of the word “application” for a computing device. It is completely generic for what Apple and everyone else has been using it for, its use in “App Store” has no novelty, and is no more distinctive, original, or trade-markable than “Shoe Store” would be for Payless or Kinney Shoe.
This isn’t about being against or for Apple or Microsoft, and people should stop letting the companies involved cloud their thinking. Simply, it’s about common sense. Apple tried to be cheeky and stop others from using the very word that had come into common use for mobile computing applications as their store name (numerous stores launched around the same time used “app” in their title - one even used “app store” as part of its title). What Apple tried to do was an improper use of the trademark system and Apple is almost certainly going to lose this one.
Posted by Code Monkey in Midstate New York on May 16, 2011 at 5:27 AM (PDT)