News
NAND-based, video-capable iPod on hold?
Despite rumors and speculation focused on a NAND flash-based iPod video, Apple may have to hold off on introducing such a device due to recent price trends. DigiTimes reports that Taiwan-based memory module producers claim Apple has placed monthly orders for around 20 million 1 Gbit units, which the companies are attributing to a flash-based, video-capable iPod. Based on recent pricing trends, however, at least one flash-related sales manager at a Taiwanese memory house believes “Apple may need to postpone its launch plans for the NAND flash-based iPod video beyond the third quarter as the product would not be competitive.” All fifth-generation iPods are currently based on hard disk drives, while the iPod nano, shuffle, and upcoming iPhone all use flash-based storage.
Related Stories
- Apple patent details ‘iGroups’ location-based service
- Apple updates iWork.com with new iPhone, iPad interface
- iPod ‘explodes’ in school, commenter claims student at fault
- Survey: iPod touch users spend more time using apps
- ‘iPod room’ created for CA model home
- Apple wins appeal in iPod hearing loss suit
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Apple patent details ‘iGroups’ location-based service
- EA posts details of upcoming Sims 3, SimCity titles
- Scosche rolls out netSuit, netSuit Pro for iPad
- T-Mobile USA to launch iPhone in late 2010, early 2011?
- China Mobile hopes to carry iPhone, iPad
- Apple Board member Jerome B. York passes away
- Harman/JBL previews Spring 2010 speaker lineup
- Gameloft releases Sports Pack bundle
- HTC ‘disagrees’ with Apple suit, will ‘fully defend itself’
- Apple releases iPhone SDK 3.2 Beta 5 for iPad
Recent Reviews
- Tapulous Kings Of Leon Revenge
- Thought Out Ped3-U Universal Stand
- Microlab MD332 2.1 Stereo Audio System
- New Potato Technologies FLPR Universal Remote for iPod touch + iPhone
- PowerA Universal Remote Case for iPhone 3G/3GS
- V-Moda Remix, Remix Remote + Remix Vocal
- Capcom Street Fighter IV
- CableJive duaLink Sync Splitter Cable for iPod + iPhone
- TJM Innovations Bandshell for iPhone 3G/3GS
- Tunewear GameHandle for iPhone 3G/3GS + iPod touch
Recent Articles
- iPhone Gems: Cubetrix 3D, Pool Pro Online 3 + Where’s Waldo? The Fantastic Journey
- iPhone Gems: Video Recorders for Original iPhone + iPhone 3G
- Ask iLounge 3-12-10
- iPhone Gems: Raging Thunder II, Radio Flare Redux + The Price is Right 2010
- iPhone Gems: Top 12 Twitter Apps Reviewed
- Ask iLounge 3-05-10
- iPhone Gems: Denizen, Sparkle the Game, Tilt to Live + Vector Tanks Extreme!
- iPhone Gems: Colorbind, Color Storm!, Dora Saves the Crystal Kindom + Go, Diego, Go!
- Ask iLounge 2-26-10
- iPhone Gems: Alice in Wonderland, Noby Noby Boy, and Thumpies
1
Downer…but if Apple were to outdo the 80GB storage cap of the 5.5G, that big version of the 6G would be really pricey. Still, for myself I’d rather have a NAND-based 6G than another HD-based unit; there’s only so much shock abuse a hard drive can take.
Posted by flatline response on June 8, 2007 at 12:59 PM (PDT)
2
Yeah I agree, after all I have the 80 gig ipod, and I really really want to go down a 6g 5 gig ipod video, yep its just want I want.
Posted by stevenjuke on June 8, 2007 at 3:16 PM (PDT)
3
Wouldn’t be too bad if Apple reduced the Video’s capacity to maybe 20GB, seeing as the average person doesn’t watch videos on their iPod every day, nor actually needs to carry around 10,000+ songs with them. Maybe there could be two different 6Gs, one with flash memory and another using a HDD to keep both parties happy?
Posted by The Soup Nazi on June 8, 2007 at 4:07 PM (PDT)
4
Why do we need a flash ipod? Runners want a little nano, not the full ipod. How many regular users actually destroy their HD?
Posted by Chris on June 8, 2007 at 10:41 PM (PDT)
5
100Gb please. I’ll take a hard drive until flash becomes viable.
Posted by Japester on June 9, 2007 at 2:42 AM (PDT)
6
stevenjuke, 5 gb of video is about 2 or 3 hours, is that even worth it? you could put maybe 5 tv show episodes or a little less than 2 movies.
Posted by killa on June 9, 2007 at 5:48 PM (PDT)
7
lol your talking to a guy who has 60 megs left on his 80 gig ipod. So no I don’t want a ipod with flash memory.
Posted by stevenjuke on June 10, 2007 at 3:15 PM (PDT)
8
My bad…I meant to say ‘shock and abuse’. Dirt, dust and mud also aren’t great for a HD, either.
Dunno about runners and joggers, but I’ve started to trail ride. Talk about abusing one’s gear (and body); because of the conditions even with the best weather, I take my 8GB nano with me but since a significant part of my library is ripped @ 320k (and even some in Apple Lossless), 8GBs isn’t as much storage to work with as one might think. Since it’s waaay too much effort to re-rip just for a weekend out riding, I need (okay, want) more flash storage.
Due to battery life, I doubt I’d ever use an iPod for vids away from a ready power source, but either a larger cap nano or a NAND 6G would be perfect for tunes out in the backwoods over an extended weekend. Y’all never will know what tune(s) would be perfect out on the trail; gotta have that cap, just in case.
Posted by flatline response on June 11, 2007 at 3:29 AM (PDT)