News
Report: Beatles music won’t be iTunes exclusive
The Beatles’ music catalog will soon be offered online, but will not be available exclusively from the iTunes Store as recent rumors have suggested. Neil Aspinall, the head of the Beatles’ Apple Corps, told Fox News that when the Beatles songs do get released online for downloading, “it will be on all the services, not just one.” That potentially means stores such as iTunes, Yahoo Music, Microsoft’s Zune store, and RealNetwork’s Rhapsody could all offer the the Beatles catalog.
Fox News also speculates that Apple Corps may have received iTunes and iPod royalties in its recent settlement with Apple Inc. “If you missed it, Apple Corps. sued Apple Inc. in 2002 over trademark violations after signing a 1991 agreement,” reports Fox News. “Jobs et al won, but the case went to appeal. Before the appeals court could make a ruling, a settlement was reached. The Beatles, sources say (and not Aspinall, whom I didn’t even discuss this with), may have won royalties on Apple iTunes/iPod hardware as part of the settlement.”
Related Stories
- iBooks Author EULA draws criticism
- Apple posts streaming video of education event
- Apple releases iTunes 10.5.3 with support for iTunes U
- Coverage of Apple’s education event begins at 10AM ET
- Apple education event to focus on content, K-12 market
- Apple working with McGraw-Hill, to launch ‘GarageBand’ for textbooks?
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly coming early Monday, giveaway reminder
- iBackFlip launches Somersault case for iPad
- Motorola loses third patent case against Apple in Germany
- Apple rushing to pick demo apps for next iPad launch
- Apple airs new Siri-focused iPhone 4S ads
- Periscope Audio Lab releases SpaceSampler
- Evernote Hello improves contact entry features
- eMailGanizer Pro adds Universal Inbox, Smart Folders
- Scosche rolls out bassDock for iPad
- German court rejects Apple bid to ban Galaxy 10.1N
Recent Reviews
- Cygnett Apollo for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! ID for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! With Stand for iPhone 4/4S
- Solid Line Products RightShift 2 Removable Keyboard Case for iPad 2
- Spigen SGP Kuel F60Q Battery Pack
- Just Mobile Highway + Highway Pro for iPod, iPhone + iPad
- Speck CandyShell and CandyShell Satin for iPhone 4/4S
- Jensen JiPS-310i Docking Speaker for iPod, iPhone & iPad
- FrappeDesign Smart Sleeve for iPad 2
Recent Articles
- iOS Gems: Adventures of Tintin, Reckless Racing 2 + Scramble With Friends
- Ask iLounge 2-3-12
- Making The Case For - And Against - An Apple iTV Television
- Instant Expert: iTunes U for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iBooks 2.0
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: Honorable Mentions
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: iPod, iPhone, iPad + Mac
- iOS Gems: Bug Princess, Dora Hops Into Phonics, It’s A Small World, Sleepy Jack + X Is For X-Ray
- The Complete Guide to Managing iTunes Videos
- Editorial: As CES Grows, Will Microsoft’s Loss Be Apple’s Gain?
1
so much about beatles. I am sick, tired. if you want albums, buy CDs. that’s it. whatever it is exclusive or not, I don’t care.
Posted by Edward on February 13, 2007 at 7:39 AM (PDT)
2
It doesn’t bother me as I only buy CDs. I only wish they’d release more volumes of “The Capitol Albums”.
Posted by Galley in Greenville, SC on February 13, 2007 at 8:24 AM (PDT)
3
Article does Not address issue of temporary/limited iTunes exclusivity.
Posted by Benton on February 13, 2007 at 10:35 AM (PDT)
4
I think it only makes sense to have it on as many online music stores as possible. It would allow more people with different devices to buy and more money for the record company.
Posted by canadan on February 13, 2007 at 2:45 PM (PDT)
5
Edward, I think the majority of us see this as Beatles online = Beatles cd’s remastered, that’s what the big deal is. I’m sure nobody is clamoring to get Beatles in 128 AAC, just to possibly have the recording sound more like the original records and not to cringe when we put on Sgt. Pepper’s with headphones on.
Posted by E on February 13, 2007 at 8:45 PM (PDT)