News
TEN Technology readies Bluetooth naviPlay remote
By Dennis Lloyd
Publisher, iLounge
Published: Tuesday, January 20, 2004
News Category: iPod Accessories
“Impulsesoft, the leading Bluetooth(R) Audio solution provider, today announced that TEN Technology has licensed its Bluetooth stereo technology. TEN Technology, the company that introduced the naviPod(TM) wireless remote control for Apple’s iPod, the leading digital music player in the world, demonstrated the TEN naviPlay(TM), the first Bluetooth stereo adapter and remote control designed specifically for the iPod, on January 6, 2004 at the MacWorld Expo in San Francisco, CA.
‘Superior audio quality and long battery life are critical for naviPlay to meet the high expectations of iPod owners. Impulsesoft’s iWISH and iWISA deliver 44.1KHz and 48KHz stereo audio with a long battery life,’ said John Lin, CEO of TEN Technology.”
Editor’s note: Here are photos of the naviPlay prototype as seen at Macworld SF.
Related Stories
- Griffin, Crayola team on Case Creator
- IK Multimedia ships iRig Mix
- Focal offers Spirit One over-ear headphones
- Etón ships Rukus Solar Bluetooth speaker
- Audio-Technica debuts ATH-ANC9 noise-canceling headphones
- Bowers & Wilkins announces P3 Headphones
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- Pulp adds iCloud sync, new Home Page
- WordPress for iOS adds Push Notifications
- Sony launches Music Unlimited for iOS
- Apple device poll ends, computing poll begins
- Fruit Ninja adds new features and power-ups
- Apple to sell Nest Learning Thermostat
- Third-gen iPad to launch in Guam, Philippines May 29
- Apple tweaks App Store with Editors’ Choice, Free picks
- Panic releases Diet Coda
- Booq rolls out new Folio for iPad
Recent Reviews
- Pelican i1075 Hardback Case for iPad
- Skinit Skins for iPad (3rd-Generation)
- Spigen SGP Steinheil Ultra Optics Screen Protector for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- ZeroChroma VarioProtect for iPhone 4/4S
- BodyGuardz UltraTough Clear Skins for iPad (3rd-Gen)
- Wrapsol Original + Ultra Hybrid Protective Film for iPad 2/iPad (3rd-Gen)
- iBattz Mojo Removable Power Card Wallet
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Power View Pro S 2.1A Dual Charging Dock
- dreamGEAR i.Sound Universal Power View
- Sena Cases Florence Portfolio for iPad (3rd-Gen)
Recent Articles
- Removing music from iTunes after copying to iPod
- iOS Gems: Farm 123, Facebook Camera, Scribblenauts, Shoot the Zombirds + Virtua Tennis Challenge
- iTunes TV show size totals don’t match actual disk storage
- Consolidating Multiple iTunes Libraries
- Converting Purchased Videos to 1080p HD
- Find My Friends always reports home location
- Creating an iTunes Match library from an external hard drive
- Benefits of keeping apps in iTunes when using iCloud
- Recovering iTunes from an External Hard Drive
- Normalizing volume levels for Voice Memos


1
Umm exactly what is the point of this thing? It would make sense if it were a tiny little thing that looked like the current remote without a wire.
This basically is an ipod, except that you need to have an iPod already to make it work!
Wtf.
Posted by s_n_m on January 20, 2004 at 9:04 AM (PDT)
2
No, the remote is noticably smaller than the ipod. One of the best aspects, however, is that your ipod has moving parts (the HD/head) while the remote doesn’t: as such, if your ipod is in your bag at the gym, while you’re going cardio or something, you’re not risking your ipod as much.
Moreover, the weight seems to be far less.
Posted by Druid on January 20, 2004 at 9:09 AM (PDT)
3
You can also hang the small receiver around your neck, attach headphones to it and roam around the room while your iPod sits on a desk somewhere. it’s not clear what the maximum range will be until the product ships.
Posted by Dennis Lloyd in Irvine, CA on January 20, 2004 at 9:25 AM (PDT)
4
I need one! someone email me please with pricing and info, or if someone from Ten is reading, can I beta test and write a review? I have written rave reviews in the paintball world
this is perfect for my car.
Posted by Anthony on January 20, 2004 at 9:51 AM (PDT)
5
“it’s not clear what the maximum range will be until the product ships.”
if its bluetooth, it’ll be long enough ^_-
The only problem is price. The Navipod itself is already soo expensive a basic infrared remote. Imagine something with bluetooth, 8 hour li-ion battery, and lcd screen.
if it was around the same price as the navipod, i’d order it straight away!
Posted by Redux on January 20, 2004 at 10:49 AM (PDT)
6
It did say that Impulsesoft was a short range wirless solutions, so i wouldnt be expecting to leave your ipod in your car while your in the gym… but maybe
it would likely work better if you wanted to keep your ipod in your locker and transmitted from there…
Posted by Steve on January 20, 2004 at 11:20 AM (PDT)
7
I went to http://www.impulsesoft.com/ and checked out the stats for their other bluetooth solution (iWish)and this is what I found:
Bluetooth
Profile: A2DP, AVRCP, Headset, Handsfree
Module: Class II
Connectivity: Point – to – Point
Range : 8 meters
Specification: BQB Certification (version 1.1)
I’m guessing the range will be something simular to that.
Posted by noname in Ottawa on January 20, 2004 at 11:35 AM (PDT)
8
I dont think it would be so great for your car. How would you use it there????
Posted by Jon on January 20, 2004 at 4:26 PM (PDT)
9
All I’ve wanted since I got my first and second iPod is the ability to utilize wireless headphones. There is nothing worse than turning your head slighty and yanking out an earphone, or catching a wire on a doorknob or something. If this product is in any way able to make this desire a reality, I’d order two!
Posted by Mmcxii on January 20, 2004 at 5:01 PM (PDT)
10
I used to have the WM-WX808 ( http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~an4t-tkns/taro/walkman/199302/wm-wx808.jpg ) back in the mid-90s, and that wireless remote had a bigger and more useful screen than this remote, why can’t the screen be on the front than the side??
Posted by voodoo on January 20, 2004 at 5:05 PM (PDT)
11
It’s as big as an iPod mini. But with a much smaller LCD and no scrollwheel.
Posted by Timur on January 21, 2004 at 4:35 PM (PDT)