News
Update: UK military denies iPod ban
“The pocket-sized digital music player, which can store thousands of songs, is one of a series of banned gadgets that the military will no longer allow into most sections of its headquarters in the UK and abroad.
Devices with large storage capabilities—most notably those with a Universal Serial Bus (or USB) plug used to connect to a computer—have been treated with greater suspicion of late by government agencies and corporations alike.”
Update: The British Ministry of Defense has denied to the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) that the military has imposed an outright ban on iPods or portable storage devices in general. A spokesman clarified that only specific secure areas are or will be deemed off-limits to such devices, and that the iPod was not specifically targeted by the government.
Related Stories
- Key iPhone, iPod executive left Apple last year
- Apple seeds iOS 5.1 beta 3 to developers
- Corning details Gorilla Glass 2: 20% thinner
- Code found in iOS 5.1 points to quad-core chips
- GameStop sees ‘strong’ interest in iOS trade program
- Kindle app adds magazines, PDF document support
Comments
If you have a comment, news tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods/iPhones/iPad or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod/iPhone/iPad products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, and fully identify yourself if you do. We will delete comments containing advertising, astroturfing, trolling, personal attacks, offensive language, or other objectionable content, then ban and/or publicly identify violators.
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly coming early Monday, giveaway reminder
- iBackFlip launches Somersault case for iPad
- Motorola loses third patent case against Apple in Germany
- Apple rushing to pick demo apps for next iPad launch
- Apple airs new Siri-focused iPhone 4S ads
- Periscope Audio Lab releases SpaceSampler
- Evernote Hello improves contact entry features
- eMailGanizer Pro adds Universal Inbox, Smart Folders
- Scosche rolls out bassDock for iPad
- German court rejects Apple bid to ban Galaxy 10.1N
Recent Reviews
- Cygnett Apollo for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! ID for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! for iPhone 4/4S
- Case-Mate Pop! With Stand for iPhone 4/4S
- Solid Line Products RightShift 2 Removable Keyboard Case for iPad 2
- Spigen SGP Kuel F60Q Battery Pack
- Just Mobile Highway + Highway Pro for iPod, iPhone + iPad
- Speck CandyShell and CandyShell Satin for iPhone 4/4S
- Jensen JiPS-310i Docking Speaker for iPod, iPhone & iPad
- FrappeDesign Smart Sleeve for iPad 2
Recent Articles
- iOS Gems: Adventures of Tintin, Reckless Racing 2 + Scramble With Friends
- Ask iLounge 2-3-12
- Making The Case For - And Against - An Apple iTV Television
- Instant Expert: iTunes U for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch
- Instant Expert: Secrets & Features of iBooks 2.0
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: Honorable Mentions
- iLounge’s 2012 CES Best of Show Awards: iPod, iPhone, iPad + Mac
- iOS Gems: Bug Princess, Dora Hops Into Phonics, It’s A Small World, Sleepy Jack + X Is For X-Ray
- The Complete Guide to Managing iTunes Videos
- Editorial: As CES Grows, Will Microsoft’s Loss Be Apple’s Gain?
1
What about key chain drives? They’re getting larger in capacity and are much more concealable.
Posted by Obadiah on July 13, 2004 at 7:22 AM (PDT)
2
most ppl would probobly think it sucks as an idea,but, the UK military has ther reasons. not something good for the soldiers :(
Posted by THE bomb on July 13, 2004 at 7:56 AM (PDT)
3
it’s a good idea- maybe they can keep them in a special clear holding locker or something, but not inside the base.
Posted by g on July 13, 2004 at 8:01 AM (PDT)
4
You can’t deny that they deny denying the use of iPods. I deny anyone who denies that.
PS how about just disabling the use of external drives on sensitive machines? Lock it in a cabinet if nothing else—probably a good idea anyway! (Someone will come along and clip the mouse cord and splice in a drive though… better have software protection too.)
Posted by Nagromme on July 13, 2004 at 9:47 AM (PDT)
5
It must be a slow news day for the media to spin such a story like this.
This made the front page of CNN….boo….
Posted by AMG on July 13, 2004 at 10:20 AM (PDT)
6
It’s the military…they can ban whatever they want. It’s just like banning the use of cellular phones that have photographic capabilities. Doesn’t that make sense though? It does to me…but I use my mini every day at work! BTW, I’m in the US Air Force.
Posted by Asian_N02 in Delaware on July 13, 2004 at 11:51 AM (PDT)
7
Sam denies caring.
Posted by Sam on July 14, 2004 at 11:30 AM (PDT)
8
Yeah slow news day me thinks! Which government wouldn’t want to stop people walking away with vital security informantion…
Posted by wobble on July 14, 2004 at 12:55 PM (PDT)
9
I’m to tired to write… Please rearrange the letters in your own mind….
Posted by wobble on July 14, 2004 at 12:57 PM (PDT)
10
This is almost as stupid as the US aemy banning cans of coke because they might contain a GPS and a cell phone
Posted by Brad on July 14, 2004 at 5:16 PM (PDT)
11
The Beeb, again. Sheesh! They still have a credibility problem even without Gilligan!
Posted by Obadiah on July 15, 2004 at 7:59 AM (PDT)
12
It’s the ‘Minsitry Of Defence’. not Defense.
Why? because that’s how we Brits spell it.
Posted by Mr Pedant on July 16, 2004 at 5:19 AM (PDT)
13
Isn’t that because the language was called ‘English’, I wonder why they would call a language that? After all there’s a country called something similar
Posted by UKBloke on July 30, 2004 at 9:55 PM (PDT)