comments

So everybody wants it because it has a color screen? Thats a big argument with people.

But a screen that is 1.5 in. in slightly pathetic.

Posted by thecommanche on September 13, 2005 at 6:50 PM (PDT) Comment 26

You don't comment about one important and negative fact : Nano is compatible only with OSX 10.3.4 + USB2
What about people like me with an iMac+firewire/USB+OSX 10.2.8 (and still very satisfied with it)!!!!
I like my iPod photo 30GB but I dislike this hidden strategy of pushing up the related harwares and softwares

Posted by EricB on September 14, 2005 at 2:08 AM (PDT) Comment 27

I can't seem to find out? Can you use this as a jump drive or disk? You can use the Shuffle and full size ipod, but not the mini as a disk. Also, will it automatically downsample tracks like the shuffle does?

Posted by rickmcd on September 14, 2005 at 2:59 AM (PDT) Comment 28

Has anybody got it to work with an Alpine KCA420i iPod adapter for their car. Although the track/playlist info displays on the head unit I'm not getting any sound.

Posted by Teeman on September 14, 2005 at 4:20 AM (PDT) Comment 29

I unplugged my 40 Gig 3rd generation iPod from my Alpine KCA-420 and plugged in my new Nano 4 gig and it worked just the same, sound, display, etc.

Posted by Don Fera on September 14, 2005 at 3:47 PM (PDT) Comment 30

Yep your correct, I found a lose wire and it all works perfect now. Don't suppose youv'e figured how to get the head unit to play randomly/shuffle within a playlist?

Posted by Teeman on September 14, 2005 at 4:59 PM (PDT) Comment 31

anyone tried the nano with the Kenwood KCA-IP500 unit?

Posted by austinjreid on September 15, 2005 at 2:58 AM (PDT) Comment 32

Could 16GB Nano be far away? This is from dpreview.com...a digital camera site.

"Samsung Electronics is planning to produce a new memory chip that will double the storage capacity of digital cameras, reports Reuters. It is expected that Samsung, which holds a 60% share of the NAND flash memory market, will launch a 16-gigabit chip late next year. NAND flash memory chips are built into memory cards or USB memory products."

One can only hope...

Posted by badburro on September 16, 2005 at 6:45 AM (PDT) Comment 33

does any one remeber when the 3gs came out they sacraficed battery for size of course the batt length will drop at first on any major size shift just give it a couple of months and it will go up besides 14 hours is a damn long time any ways so its no like the bat of old where it was only 10 hrs ha just my 2 cents

Posted by BIGP on September 16, 2005 at 4:22 PM (PDT) Comment 34

Sure, Nano is cool, and looks uber cool...but I still prefer my 30 GB colorpod; it's what I take with me everywhere and serves my music needs and otherwise, superbly. So, yeh, I definitely prefer it.

Posted by Andipod on September 16, 2005 at 4:33 PM (PDT) Comment 35

The Samsung chips being mass produced next year are 16 giga BITS, which is 2 giga BYTES. What is truly amazing with the iPod Nano is that you would be hard pressed to find 4GB of flash storage alone for $250. A 4GB flash storage device alone is a good deal at this price. I think the combination of style, size, performance, durability, and price will have Apple selling a TON of these this year. It was extremely hard to find ANY flash-based music player that had 1GB for less than $100. A 2GB flash-based iPod at $200 is a good deal. A 4GB model at $250 is unbelievable. I can't see an 8GB model anytime soon for less than $400 (that's $50/GB).

Posted by MusicManMike on September 16, 2005 at 5:48 PM (PDT) Comment 36

Got my 2GB nano 2 days ago and its definately a winner. Only problem I have had so far is I don't seem to be getting decent battery life. I charged it up fuly last night, listened to a couple of tracks, showed off a few photo's and then turned it off.

I'd say I probably messed around with it for a couple of hours max. I went to turn it on an hour ago and the battery is flat. Anybody ele experienced poor battery life?

Posted by mrunderhill on September 17, 2005 at 1:53 PM (PDT) Comment 37

I dropped by my local Apple store in Portland, Oregon to check out the Nano. They had some 2GBs in white but were sold out of everything else. According to the salesman, both the black and white 4GBs sell out within hours of each shipment's arrival and the black 2GBs take just a little longer.

After checking out the display models, I must say that the Nano really is all it's cracked up to be and a black 4GBer will make for a nice second ipod. But given how easily the finish scratches, I'll wait for a decent choice of cases to hit the market first.

Posted by Downing on September 18, 2005 at 4:27 PM (PDT) Comment 38

I just sold my 30Gb 3rd generation iPod on Amazon Marketplace. I now have a 4Gb Nano and a iGb Shuffle. Although I would have bought the Nano purely on style and 'lickability' I pondered whether to await the inevitable 6/8Gb models. My 30Gb iPod usually lay in a draw for much of the year yet I used the Shuffle every day so I reckoned the combination of Nano and shuffle was perfect for me. It doesn't take long to download a new playlist for the day/week/month.

Posted by frere on September 19, 2005 at 6:53 AM (PDT) Comment 39

Audio Skip?

I have had my black 4g nano for 4 days now and just love it. It sounds great and is so easy to tote around.

I am wondering if anyone has had trouble with music skipping? Songs that I have downloaded from emusic.com seem to skip once and a while. These files are ripped in VBR with lame. Interesting though...my own songs which I rip in VBR at the highest level with Lame and Exact Audio Copy do not seem to skip.

Very pleased with the product. I'm just curious to others' experience.

Posted by coprock on September 19, 2005 at 9:51 AM (PDT) Comment 40

The Samsung chips being mass produced next year are 16 giga BITS, which is 2 giga BYTES.

True enough, but the following is from a Reuters article by Yoo Choonsik, byline dated Sept. 12, 2005

"Sixteen of the new chips could be incorporated into a 32-gigabyte memory card capable of storing articles from a daily newspaper stretching back 200 years, or 8,000 MP3 music titles playing for 680 hours, Samsung said."

Also, the expectation is that 32Gbit chips are forthcoming as well.

Posted by flatline response on September 21, 2005 at 4:19 PM (PDT) Comment 41

8GB Nano in 18 months.
20GB Mini in 2 years.
$250 for the Nano, $300 for the Mini.

Posted by G-man on September 22, 2005 at 5:38 AM (PDT) Comment 42

I went for the shuffle when it came out and quite liked it but missed a display after a while. So getting a Nano was a no-brainer for me. It's lovely, just what I need. A "real" iPod with an amazing form factor. Except for the question of just how to wear it.

Out of the box you get the device itself and the standard earphones. How are you supposed to use it? Have it dangling from the earphones (at an awkwardward angle because of the jack's position)? No way, the thing weighs twice as much as the shuffle.
For the time being I have reverted to wearing shirts with a breast pocket but come on, this can't be the way it's meant to be.

Obviously I'm supposed to buy a separate lanyard at an extra EUR 39. Available in 4-6 weeks...

Hey Apple, what a lousy rip-off. Your products used to be fully usable out of the box, which was one of the factors that made them unique. Not anymore, huh? Sad...

Posted by eimeck on September 22, 2005 at 6:24 AM (PDT) Comment 43

I just received my iPod Nano today at lunch and I have absolutly no complaints. Sure the black does show finger prints like there is no tomorrow but I think that some of the mini's colors were a little too cheesy and therefore I refrained from buying one. I think that Apple's new entry is wicked cool and I havent found a single thing that I dont like about it.

I transferred something like 560 songs onto it when I received it and it took no more than 5 or 6 minutes - way faster than I had expected.

I think that anyone wanting a serious MP3 player should check this machine out!

Posted by theblueecat on September 22, 2005 at 11:10 PM (PDT) Comment 44

I love the Nano keep up the good work Apple
only con is that i have too much music to fit on the Nano (current capcity of my 40gb ipod - 32GB)

Apple please make a thin 40GB Ipod !!!

Posted by Till on September 23, 2005 at 1:52 AM (PDT) Comment 45

I just got my 4GB Nano a couple of days ago. Considering my first iPod is a 2G, I'm really happy about the look and feel about this one.

My comment today is regarding this: "You also cannot use Photo Import on nano: the iPod Camera Connector won't work, another deliberate differentiator on Apple's part that makes more sense given the nano's smaller storage capacity."

I find it odd that it doesn't work when the few papers that came in the box says that it does. Unless I read it wrong. I'm going to check when I get home tonight. -- If we are both right, then someone messed up, huh?

~Dot

Posted by [email protected] on September 23, 2005 at 11:13 AM (PDT) Comment 46

Freely translated article from MacBidouille:
http://www.macbidouille.com/news/2005-09-27/#11625
Who wants the nano's skin ?

The information is spreding like gunpowder fire on the Web. The iPod nano would have some fragility problems with it's LCD screen.
All started from the site flawedmusicplayer.com who has published some personnal comments by some users and those have been replayed everywhere.
We are not in the custom to defend Apple. But seeing how this affair escalates like wildfire we can't help but think about a disinformation campaign.
Apple has alreay sold thousands of iPod nano and all we have is a few similar cases. The iPod nano is very thin, but very rigid, and unless sitting without pulling it out of one's pocket, we don't see how it would be possible to break the LCD screen.
Some will remember a similar campaign tried to stain the iPod mini when it came out. Reports were saying the headphone jack was fragile. Already then we protested the generalisation of a few cases and time proved us right.
There are a lot of companies who want to discredit Apple to try and gain market share.The iPod being popular, medias relay these infos !
PS: To verify my feeling, I've just pressed really strongly with both thumbs on the screen of my iPod nano, a lot stronger than one would during normal usage. It is intact.
Under these conditions, and without eliminating the possibility of a few defective units, it is hard to believe that it could shatter spontaneously !

Another comprehensive look at it is at our friends or Ars Technica:
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/nano.ars

Posted by Amanita on September 27, 2005 at 9:55 AM (PDT) Comment 47

Lounge review guys - Your logic that one of the negative aspects of the nano is that it's not compatible with the flood of iPod accessories on the market is ridiculous. You've got it backwards - Apple does not exist to serve the iPod accessories market, they're in business to create the best products they can that serve us, their faithful customers. Raise your hand if you DIDN'T buy a nano because you couldn't get an FM tuner to go with it. Um hm. Just as I thought.

Posted by bOMBfACTORY on September 27, 2005 at 12:40 PM (PDT) Comment 48

I just bought the Nano 7 days ago, and at first it was the most amazing product I had ever owned! I was the most proud father of this little object and was very proud to show it to anyone that I could. Now that the 7 days have gone by, im starting to get a little wary of how easily the nano scratches, and I've been seeing that people have the same problem as me, I am very careful with it, store in the little ipod socks,when it's in my pocket, it's the sole object in there, but no matter how careful I am with it the darn thing just somehow has seemed to be scratched way beyond it's short 7 day life! I went out and bought the Iskin for the ipod mini, and it just looks horrible! So I decided to call the apple store from where I bought the nano to see if they are going to be doing anything about this issue, and the clerk told me over the phone, that I should have been more careful with my nano, I should have bought a case or the ipod socks, when I told her that I did buy the socks, and always keep it in there, and am as careful as anyone will ever be the ipod, and still it's utterly scratched, she said that , "no, we will not do anything about this issue". I have been one of the biggest apple fans since I was a kid, (im now 25) I've brought a lot of customers to apple, but I have to say that right now I'm am very upset by this issue, and if they do not do something about this, Apple might have finally done me, and the Loyal Mac Fan base community wrong. Please do something about this Steve!

Posted by estephanovich on September 27, 2005 at 3:54 PM (PDT) Comment 49

What I'd like to know is why Apple has not figured out the snafu in the itunes interface error 1607 and fixed it since this is what-generation iPod!?! Having just gotten the Nano, I spent 3 hours yesterday (about 2 of it on the phone with an Apple employee who was Googling my problem since he had never heard of it before). Very frustrating since I had to walk them through all the fixes none of which were working (yes the virus checkers were off, no there were no firewalls, yes I am the admin on the PC). At the end of it, I still did not have a working interface but did have a very helpful message from iPod asking me to give them $49 to get help for the device that couldn't be installed. Apple only has 6% of the home computer user base so it would be nice if someone at Apple understood that there are alternatives (to throwing more money at dead batteries, so-called warranties, and stop-gap solutions such as EphPod and X Player. If you want to win me to the Apple family - and I'm a journalist so it's not just me - then treat me like I'm smart - and don't build in insidious ways to suck my money away from me before you win me.

Posted by glammsyl on September 27, 2005 at 5:50 PM (PDT) Comment 50
 <  1 2 3 4 >
related reviews

Apple content delivery network for faster downloads now live in US, Europe
Apps of the Week: NPR One, Crazy Taxi: City Rush, Interactive Alphabet 4.0 + more
Report: Apple TV relaunch not coming this year
Report: Apple eliminating positions of some Beats employees
Russian government seeks Apple source code
Square announces new Reader for chip cards
Apple TV adds FOX Now, CNBC channels
Popular Bitcoin wallet app Blockchain returns to App Store
Report: Apple Stores to support carrier early iPhone upgrade programs
Report: Apple buying talk radio app Swell

related reviews

Plantronics BackBeat Fit Bluetooth Wireless Headphones
ClamCase ClamCase Pro for iPad Air
Kenu Airframe+ Portable Car Mount
Incipio offGRID Smart Bluetooth Low Energy-Enabled Portable 6000mAh Backup Battery
Divoom Voombox Travel Rugged Portable Wireless Speaker
Logitech protection+ for iPhone 5/5s and +trip
Beats Powerbeats2 Wireless
Incipio Steno Ultra-Thin Bluetooth Keyboard Folio for iPad Air
OtterBox Resurgence Power Case for iPhone 5/5s
Gumdrop Cases FoamTech Case for iPad Air

related reviews

What’s New in iTunes 12
iLounge Picks: Five Great Summer Party Speakers
Editorial: Endings And Beginnings
Live From CE Week 2014: Brand New iPad, iPhone + Mac Accessories!
What’s New In iOS 8 For iPad, iPhone + iPod touch
iLounge Multi-Editorial: WWDC 2014’s iOS 8, OS X Yosemite + More
The Complete Guide to Apple TV Channels
iHistory: From iPod + iTunes to iPhone, Apple TV + iPad, 2001 to 2010
iHistory: From iPod + iTunes to iPhone, Apple TV + iPad: 2011 to Today
Viewing only downloaded iTunes Match tracks