Reviews
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly coming Monday, giveaway update
- Apple drops refurbished fourth-gen iPad, mini prices
- Judge: US can show Apple e-book pricing conspiracy
- AT&T’s GoPhone to add LTE/HSPA+ support for iPhone
- Report: iOS 7 ‘black, white, and flat all over’
- Apple WWDC Keynote set for June 10
- Apps: Foursquare 6.2, Hyper Breaker Turbo, Pandora 4.3 + Shazam 6.0
- Apple patent application details interactive AirPlay, TV
- Report: iWatch pushed to late 2014?
- Griffin releases iPhone 5 Survivor + Catalyst Waterproof Case
Recent Reviews
- Lynktec TruGlide Pro Precision Stylus
- C4 Electronics Dolry HiFi Stone 30-Pin AirPlay Adapter
- Boombotix Boombot Rex Bluetooth Wireless Speaker
- Nuu Splash Portable Waterproof Bluetooth Wireless Speaker
- Scosche boomBottle Weatherproof Sport Wireless Speaker
- HMDX Jam Plus Bluetooth Wireless Speaker
- Fitbit Flex Wireless Activity & Sleep Wristband
- Cambridge Audio Minx Air 100 + 200 Bluetooth + AirPlay Wireless Speakers
- Mophie Juice Pack Plus for iPhone 5
- Ultimate Ears UE Boom
Recent Articles
- Costs associated with using FaceTime
- iMessages showing as Delivered when iPhone is out of coverage
- Inability to use Find My Friends without a passcode
- Calendar info disappears after iCloud restore
- Remove old iCloud backup after restoring to a new iPhone
- Setting up a ringtone in iTunes
- Using a Wi-Fi hard drive with an iPad
- Backing up and restoring an iPod classic
- Can’t restore iPod touch without passcode
- Retaining older versions of Apps during an iOS Restore
1
The reason your marking was so high up was because of the space between the text and the graphic. Were they closer together, you would've been fine, and lowering the image ran the risk of hitting the apple logo. Also, why no samples of the Shuffle marking?
Posted by Special_K on January 17, 2006 at 3:29 PM (PST)
2
That image could have been lowered quite a bit without touching the Apple logo. It;s just shoddy placement...It was enough to make me decide I'd never trust them with my iPod.
This is why I love iLounge...they do the work that saves us money.
Posted by stark23x on January 17, 2006 at 8:44 PM (PST)
3
A skilled Prepress (production) artist at any print shop should have called that one before it went to press. While I disagree with the comment it could be shifted down, it could have been sized down 10% and look decent.
This also is a fault of iLounge. Any company with a logo should provide logo specs for reproduction -- a quality logo designer would have put an invisible box around that logo to designate negative space that no other graphic or border should enter. If not, it's not the fault of the prepress artist it was designed without thinking of multiple production options down the road.
Still, though, a quality prepress artist would have called it.
Posted by Brady J. Frey on January 18, 2006 at 8:36 AM (PST)