Reviews
Recent News
- iLounge Weekly coming Monday, giveaway update
- Apple drops refurbished fourth-gen iPad, mini prices
- Judge: US can show Apple e-book pricing conspiracy
- AT&T’s GoPhone to add LTE/HSPA+ support for iPhone
- Report: iOS 7 ‘black, white, and flat all over’
- Apple WWDC Keynote set for June 10
- Apps: Foursquare 6.2, Hyper Breaker Turbo, Pandora 4.3 + Shazam 6.0
- Apple patent application details interactive AirPlay, TV
- Report: iWatch pushed to late 2014?
- Griffin releases iPhone 5 Survivor + Catalyst Waterproof Case
Recent Reviews
- Lynktec TruGlide Pro Precision Stylus
- C4 Electronics Dolry HiFi Stone 30-Pin AirPlay Adapter
- Boombotix Boombot Rex Bluetooth Wireless Speaker
- Nuu Splash Portable Waterproof Bluetooth Wireless Speaker
- Scosche boomBottle Weatherproof Sport Wireless Speaker
- HMDX Jam Plus Bluetooth Wireless Speaker
- Fitbit Flex Wireless Activity & Sleep Wristband
- Cambridge Audio Minx Air 100 + 200 Bluetooth + AirPlay Wireless Speakers
- Mophie Juice Pack Plus for iPhone 5
- Ultimate Ears UE Boom
Recent Articles
- Costs associated with using FaceTime
- iMessages showing as Delivered when iPhone is out of coverage
- Inability to use Find My Friends without a passcode
- Calendar info disappears after iCloud restore
- Remove old iCloud backup after restoring to a new iPhone
- Setting up a ringtone in iTunes
- Using a Wi-Fi hard drive with an iPad
- Backing up and restoring an iPod classic
- Can’t restore iPod touch without passcode
- Retaining older versions of Apps during an iOS Restore
1
sorry, but that looks absolutely terrible!
it looks like it has some 'orange peel' to it like the invisible shield (which i've had on 3 ipods), but nasty airbubbles. i know you guys can do better
Posted by mdwsta4 on July 3, 2007 at 10:02 AM (PST)
2
Why does everything that Apple makes require a case or protection. You would think for $500 & $600 dollars the thing would wear a little better or come with the protection.
Posted by Flakes8 on July 3, 2007 at 11:12 AM (PST)
3
hideous.
Posted by soundsgoodtome on July 3, 2007 at 10:51 PM (PST)
4
This is ridiculous. Why something like this got beyond a board room mystifies me.
Posted by Shemp65 on July 4, 2007 at 11:20 AM (PST)
5
I purchased, applied and tried the shield zone for a out 20 days. Though it looked ok, on the small areas where the film didn't cover, it attracted grime and gunk- turning my $600 phone into a p
an ugly gross POS.
I wanted to try the film because I like the idea of not having a case. While I felt my phone was protected, it felt cheap. I refuse to use silicone.
Posted by Otsego_Undead in Washington State on August 21, 2007 at 10:12 PM (PST)